28-11-2012, 11:20 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Come on folks...be civil. Jim has laid out in a more complete and formal presentation than I've seen before his thesis. One can accept it or not.....but it does bring up some interesting points. May I suggest that those who disagree, if they care to debate or counter with their own take on the information, do so without rancor. When the research community fights among itself the only winners are those who promote the Big Lie [official version]. To me, this is a side issue - one in which Jim has obviously put much energy and many of his 'chips' on the table, as there is ample evidence that 'Oswald' was not on the sixth floor and not a shooter without this. But, we all have our pet theories and areas of interest. Carry on...but play nice kiddies.:mexican:
Sure there are some pet theories around but this has long been put to rest.
Several generations ago in fact.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.

