TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[James H. Fetzer]

Magda,

When and how has this theory "been put to rest"? I know of no argument that defeats our research. Are you suggesting that the missing shoulder is not really missing? that the obfuscated face is not really obfuscated? that Black Tie Man is not really both in front of and behind Doorman at the same time? that there is no black man's profile at the torso of Doorman? that we have not compared the right ears and found the match is with Oswald, not Lovelady? that we have not matched the right eye and found that the match is to Oswald, not Lovelady? that the 27 points of identification are not really points of identification? What are you talking about, Magda? Tell me.

Jim

Come on folks...be civil. Jim has laid out in a more complete and formal presentation than I've seen before his thesis. One can accept it or not.....but it does bring up some interesting points. May I suggest that those who disagree, if they care to debate or counter with their own take on the information, do so without rancor. When the research community fights among itself the only winners are those who promote the Big Lie [official version]. To me, this is a side issue - one in which Jim has obviously put much energy and many of his 'chips' on the table, as there is ample evidence that 'Oswald' was not on the sixth floor and not a shooter without this. But, we all have our pet theories and areas of interest. Carry on...but play nice kiddies.:mexican:

Sure there are some pet theories around but this has long been put to rest. Several generations ago in fact.