07-12-2012, 02:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2012, 06:27 PM by Vasilios Vazakas.)
I am not a forensic analyst and i cannot judge her work.
However my humble mind tells me that her effort to determine the fatal headshot
is an exercise in futility.
If Mrs. Fiester had visited the crime scene directly after the murder i would have accepted her
findings. Unfortunately the crime scene was destroyed due to the cover up, and 49 years are too long
to scientifically prove anything regarding the shots. Her theory that a shot hit JFK from the south knoll
is based on the Zfilm, a film that may or may not be altered, but certainly it was used by C.D.Jackson
as a disinfo tool.
To prove her theory she should conduct tests in Dealy Plaza to check if such a shot was possible
and to verify her results. Till then, i will consider her work with sceptisism.
However my humble mind tells me that her effort to determine the fatal headshot
is an exercise in futility.
If Mrs. Fiester had visited the crime scene directly after the murder i would have accepted her
findings. Unfortunately the crime scene was destroyed due to the cover up, and 49 years are too long
to scientifically prove anything regarding the shots. Her theory that a shot hit JFK from the south knoll
is based on the Zfilm, a film that may or may not be altered, but certainly it was used by C.D.Jackson
as a disinfo tool.
To prove her theory she should conduct tests in Dealy Plaza to check if such a shot was possible
and to verify her results. Till then, i will consider her work with sceptisism.