07-12-2012, 03:33 PM
Phil,
I will get back to David Josephs, but I am rather puzzled by your position.
What is your response to the evidence we have adduced re the following:
(1) the face of a man in the Altgens6 has been obfuscated: YES or NO
(2) the shoulder of Doorman is missing, completely gone: YES or NO
(3) the Black Tie Man is both in front of and behind him: YES or NO
(4) the profile of a black man appears around mid-torso: YES or NO
(5) Lee told Fritz he was "out with Bill Shelley in front": YES or NO
(6) Billy told the FBI he was wearing a different shirt: YES or NO
(7) Billy showed the FBI the shirt he had been wearing: YES or NO
(8) It was a red-and-white, vertically striped shirt: YES or NO
(9) It is not the shirt that Doorman is wearing: YES or NO
I thought that I was joking when I said the inmates are running the DPF.
Now, I'm not so sure.
Jim
[quote=Phil Dragoo]First things first: The thesis of this exercise has been rendered null and void: i.e., Doorman is Lovelady, not Oswald as alleged.
I append David Josephs at 392 for the summation of the winning argument:
I will get back to David Josephs, but I am rather puzzled by your position.
What is your response to the evidence we have adduced re the following:
(1) the face of a man in the Altgens6 has been obfuscated: YES or NO
(2) the shoulder of Doorman is missing, completely gone: YES or NO
(3) the Black Tie Man is both in front of and behind him: YES or NO
(4) the profile of a black man appears around mid-torso: YES or NO
(5) Lee told Fritz he was "out with Bill Shelley in front": YES or NO
(6) Billy told the FBI he was wearing a different shirt: YES or NO
(7) Billy showed the FBI the shirt he had been wearing: YES or NO
(8) It was a red-and-white, vertically striped shirt: YES or NO
(9) It is not the shirt that Doorman is wearing: YES or NO
I thought that I was joking when I said the inmates are running the DPF.
Now, I'm not so sure.
Jim
[quote=Phil Dragoo]First things first: The thesis of this exercise has been rendered null and void: i.e., Doorman is Lovelady, not Oswald as alleged.
I append David Josephs at 392 for the summation of the winning argument: