TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[James H. Fetzer]

Look. Unlike you and others here, I am interacting with the public all the time. I have presented evidence substantiating that Oswald was in the doorway--and the public does not freak out! the public is not in denial! the public is receptive to new evidence! Egad! You here on the DPF don't even know what Harold Weisberg, WHITEWASH II (1966), had to say about this. Or Jones Harris, for that matter. It is really no surprise that nitwits like you and Jan and Albert don't know the score. But at least you make an effort, even though you fail repeatedly.

[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1lCYzGD7Lk"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1lCYzGD7Lk
[/URL]
You don't know the difference between Lovelady and the man in the checkered shirt. You think that a sleeve up means that it is always that way. You don't have the integrity to admit that the photo is faked (the obfuscated man, the missing shoulder, BTM in front of and behind him at the same time, the black man's profile), that Oswald told Fritz he was "out with Bill Shelley in front", the 27 points of identification, the matching right ears, the matching left eyes, the matching craniums and hair lines--you really are something special, David Josephs! Special!

You think you can match shirts like Doorman's and Oswald's virtually ARBITRARILY? I knew you were dumb, I just didn't know you were this stupid. If you have the integrity to acknowledge that the photo was fixed--and any rational, honest student would surely admit that--then the question becomes, "Why would the Altgens6 have been altered?" That is the question I first raised in "JFK: What we know now that we didn't know then". The obvious answer is, "Only if someone had been there who should not have been." And that would have been Lee.

Have you bothered to read Harold Weisberg, WHITEWASH II (1966), since I pointed out that he discusses this extensively and explains the moves the made to cover up that Oswald was in the doorway? What we have done is independently discover and confirm what he already knew. Or is Harold Weisberg ANOTHER NUT WHO DOESN'T KNOW WHAT HE'S TALKNG ABOUT? Jan has affirmed that she is a happy ignoramus, but you are hanging out there by the slenderest of threads and are making a fool of yourself. You need to catch up with the evidence.

This is completely disgusting. You have no idea how open and receptive the public can be to TRUTH.
But how the hell would you know? You don't bother with research and betray the memory of JFK. I
am out there in the trenches and I can assure you that the people are a lot smarter than the DPF! I
am stunned but not surprised by your commitment to ignorance--a new breed of JFK know-nothings.

and you obviously have a PERFECT IDEA how easily the PUBLIC can be mislead by a supposed "expert" when this "expert" decides to promote undefensible theories
while refusing to hear conterpoint... refuses to look at it academically, and goes off half'cocked with BAD info, BAD data, BAD analogy, BAD observation abilities
and just plain BAD SCIENCE.


As I posted before Jim.... you are using the EXACT TACTICS employed by those you are trying to expose - to defend that which YOU represent to be true regardless of the actual evidence and analysis.

You might as well just state that, "We have seen no evidence that Altgens 6 was NOT altered...." while you stand there with your EYES WIDE SHUT...

Here's hoping the NEW BREED stays as far away from the proveably deceptive tactics of one James Fetzer as possible and builds on the real heroes of the community...
to someday become heroes themselves.

You wear your ad homs on your chest like medals Jim.... and have become the naked emperor taken in by the lies that surround you.
Ralph should be ashamed of himself as much as Myers or Posner need to be... that you BOUGHT IT is most sad of all.

Bye Jim... Good luck with your book/movie/special deal that MUST come with this garbage... maybe Tom Hanks will help fund the project?