08-12-2012, 12:59 AM
Taking posting lessons from Craig Lamson now?
Doofus?
Now we KNOW you've lost it Jim....
Sad state of affairs when you can't even address the post, only insult the poster....
Why does what Fritz & Bookout write about Oswald's clothes, on the same page as the SHELLEY comment, have any more or less credible than the SHELLEY COMMENT?
and if what he said is as true as the SHELLEY statement...
how do you reconcile that with Altgens 6?
No Jim... but I see that you can ARBITRARILY decide what is and isn't a MATCH based on very flawed abilities to do so.
I can also see that you STILL have no clue how probability works or how it applies here... with a comparison of PHOTOS of shirts... not even the shirts themselves.
You've become a sad, pathetic, bitter, old man.... no WONDER you sound like Lamson.
:dancingman:
Doofus?
Now we KNOW you've lost it Jim....
Sad state of affairs when you can't even address the post, only insult the poster....
Why does what Fritz & Bookout write about Oswald's clothes, on the same page as the SHELLEY comment, have any more or less credible than the SHELLEY COMMENT?
and if what he said is as true as the SHELLEY statement...
how do you reconcile that with Altgens 6?
Quote:You think you can match shirts like Doorman's and Oswald's virtually ARBITRARILY? I knew you were dumb, I just didn't know you were this stupid.
No Jim... but I see that you can ARBITRARILY decide what is and isn't a MATCH based on very flawed abilities to do so.
I can also see that you STILL have no clue how probability works or how it applies here... with a comparison of PHOTOS of shirts... not even the shirts themselves.
You've become a sad, pathetic, bitter, old man.... no WONDER you sound like Lamson.
:dancingman: