08-12-2012, 08:10 AM
Why, then, is Harold Weisberg ON OUR SIDE? You show up every now and then to demonstrate your incompetence, which is beyond measure. In this case, if you had only bothered to read WHITEWASH II (1966), "The Lovelady Diversion" and "The Lovelady Caper", you would discover that you are completely and totally wrong. Which means you aren't even competent to cite sources when you disgrace yourself. Someone is displaying himself as a despicable crank, but that ain't me. Citing Monk or Phil about this confirms you don't know your ahole from your elbow.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Harold Weisberg had a very, very, very dim view of kooks and cranks in the field. Sometimes he was to quick too judge, nonetheless Weisberg would despise Mr Fetzer and almost everything he has ever championed. He would also find Fetzers position on this topic tedious and ridiculous. Oh and thanks to Phil Drago's fascinating studies...I shall have an update on the Fetzer/Ron angle. It's an even call at the moment! Hopefully, Monk can get the time to investigate some of the production in the near future. Regardless, it will be very interesting.