08-12-2012, 02:07 PM
Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:Mark
If i understood well, what he is trying to say is, if for example Giancana who belonged in the Italian-American mafia
was involved in the assassination this does not mean that the state of Italy was involved as well.
accordingly if Lansky who belonged in the Jewish-American mafia was involved in the assassination
this does not mean that the state of Israel was involved as well.
Painting Ruby as a mafia underling is an age old tactic designed to point the finger of suspicion in the opposite direction.
Peter Dale Scott commented in Deep Politics and the Death of JFK that the House Committee investigation of Ruby chose to focus on an ethnic model of organised crime described as La Cosa Nostra. Why would they do that?
Scott described this definition of organised crime as bureaucratically distorted to the point of falsehood, and that this involved systematic distortion of the facts.
Ruby's affiliations and loyalties were all Zionist. Ruby wasn't mafioso.
If Ruby was more Mafia than Zionist, why would he claim to be an interpreter for an Israeli newspaper?