08-12-2012, 08:37 PM
What could be a more glaring illustration of your complete incompetence at research than for you to cite a rubbish attack on me for having exposed Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD. who attempted to subvert The Vancouver Hearings. You did not bother to figure out the issues, much less who was right and who was wrong, which has been your pattern here. You have no idea about this because you are utterly incompetent. And where are your answers to my questions? Do you think you can fake your way through those, too? You are simply disgracing yourself, again and again.
Greg Burnham Wrote:I am in no way agreeing with anything you just cited. I referenced that link to show only your continued display of odd thinking. I am of the opinion that the 9/11 official story is flawed, but also that the truth lies nowhere near what you and others (even those with whom you disagree) allege. I hope others visit that link NOT to agree with anyone posting there, but rather to observe the similarity in styles. It is eerily similar to watching you and Ralph Cinque feign an argument with Albert(s) Doyle.
James H. Fetzer Wrote:So Greg is finally coming out of the closet and agreeing with Alfred about DARPA "Jump Rooms", time travel, and Barack Obama having traveled to Mars with Andrew Basiago, where they were nearly eaten by carnivorous Plesiousaurs?
"Now it can be told: The Real Reason Obama was Nearly Devoured by Carnivorous Plesiousarus on Mars" by Kevin Barrett, Ph.D.,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/01/...s-on-mars/
Webre and Basiago think the Loch Ness Monster is a
plesiosaur, and that carnivorous martian plesiosaurs devour humans who teleport to Mars in CIA "jump rooms"
"The Vancouver Hearings: Subversion from Within" by Jim Fetzer and Don Fox
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/09/...om-within/
"Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD: 9/11 Disinfo Op?"
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/21/...isinfo-op/
Greg Burnham Wrote:Signs of "difficulty" are abundant with Fetzer. Not only in JFK research, but elsewhere, as well. That is not to say that his over all conclusions are necessarily incorrect, just that his means to arrive at said conclusions are rife
with ill conceived notions, poorly reasoned argumentation, and too conveniently positioned spells of apparent mental deficiency to be legitimate.
http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground...39076.html