11-12-2012, 05:40 PM
While more than willing to believe there is active disinformation going on against the Muslim Brotherhood to set them up as scapegoats, why are so many of the progressives upset with the Constitution [which I've not studied, I admit] - that it will not protect the rights of women, protesters, dissidents et al.? There seems to be a large segment of those who made the Revolution not happy for some reasons with the Constitution as it stands. I assume, however, like most Constitutions it has the possibility of amendment by the elected Parliament as they go along...
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass