24-12-2012, 09:03 AM
Agree. I don't buy the French Connection angle and i am not impressed by books who still dwell around this claim.
The French Connection is another classic disinformation project to frame the Gaullist French Intelligence and the Corsicans.
I would not believe a word Christian David said to Rivele regarding the Kennedy assassination.
Lucien Sarti is E.H. Hunt's French assassin in the Grassy Knoll, how convenient.
The other think that i find peculiar, is the merging of two different stories to identify QJ/WIN.
The story of Souetre in Dallas and the notes of William Harvey where he describes QJ/WIN.
We have no evidence that QJ/WIN was Souetre, but somehow some claim that Souetre who might have been Mertz
was QJ/WIN , but i don't see any evidence. To make it worse one of them was OAS while the other Gaullist so we are
send to wild goose chase finding dead ends that contradict each other from left to right.
Confussion and cognitive dissonance at work, once again. Some believe that QJ/WIN was Mankel. There is a chance that besides
the principal agent who was in charge, QJ/WIN might have been a generic name, an umbrella where all assassins where referred
with that name. How the document about Souetre in 1963 was connected to Harvey's notes about QJ/WIN is beyond me.
So all books about the French Connection are good to identify False Sponsors, but not to identify the true conspirators.
Some claim that since Clay Shaw was a member of Permindex that was based in Rome, and William Harvey who was also in Rome
worked together and Harvey used QJ/WIN and Corsicans to assassinate JFK. They add to to this Harvey's meetings with Rosselli
under QJ/WIN project in Florida, so the Mafia closes the circle.
The French Connection is another classic disinformation project to frame the Gaullist French Intelligence and the Corsicans.
I would not believe a word Christian David said to Rivele regarding the Kennedy assassination.
Lucien Sarti is E.H. Hunt's French assassin in the Grassy Knoll, how convenient.
The other think that i find peculiar, is the merging of two different stories to identify QJ/WIN.
The story of Souetre in Dallas and the notes of William Harvey where he describes QJ/WIN.
We have no evidence that QJ/WIN was Souetre, but somehow some claim that Souetre who might have been Mertz
was QJ/WIN , but i don't see any evidence. To make it worse one of them was OAS while the other Gaullist so we are
send to wild goose chase finding dead ends that contradict each other from left to right.
Confussion and cognitive dissonance at work, once again. Some believe that QJ/WIN was Mankel. There is a chance that besides
the principal agent who was in charge, QJ/WIN might have been a generic name, an umbrella where all assassins where referred
with that name. How the document about Souetre in 1963 was connected to Harvey's notes about QJ/WIN is beyond me.
So all books about the French Connection are good to identify False Sponsors, but not to identify the true conspirators.
Some claim that since Clay Shaw was a member of Permindex that was based in Rome, and William Harvey who was also in Rome
worked together and Harvey used QJ/WIN and Corsicans to assassinate JFK. They add to to this Harvey's meetings with Rosselli
under QJ/WIN project in Florida, so the Mafia closes the circle.