01-01-2013, 02:42 AM
Greg Burnham Wrote:We've been through this at the EF. I don't need to repeat my objections to your thesis here. Suffice it to say, IMO, you are relatively new to this type of analysis--and it shows.My model yields significant insight. And I am not a novice. Nor do I contradict. You conflate. There are two separate questions: who did it and who ordered it. Your objections are uninformed.
No offense intended. But, "normally" the fingering of the CIA at the "directorate level" is at once both spurious (possibly by intent) and naive (possibly for appearance). A very
important distinction needs to be appreciated, namely, the CIA is an AGENCY. As such, an agency works for someone else and is tasked by others (outside and ABOVE the agency
itself) to perform various responsibilities. The individual agents in any agency take orders from their superiors, but their superiors are themselves taking their orders from above
and beyond at all times.
Your model lacks insight.
Moreover, in one breath you say: WHO ASSASSINATED PRESIDENT KENNEDY?
THE SHORT ANSWER: The CIA, at the directorate level, assassinated President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, to replace him with CIA-friendly Vice President Lyndon Johnson. Former CIA director Allen Dulles issued the Kill Directive to the Agency's Deputy Director for Counterintelligence (covert military operations) James J. Angleton, a devoted Dulles assistant from before the CIA existed.
And in the next breath you say: Ruling Out the Unlikely
You seem to be contradicting yourself.
Michael Schweitzer
Attorney at Law (retired)
Attorney at Law (retired)