Q&A About the Assassination of President Kennedy

[Charles Drago]

This is indeed frustrating, Greg.

Once again the sub-contractor's hammer is being accused of commissioning and designing the mansion. God save us all.

This fellow gives us no indication that his analyses of the JFK assassination are contextualized within a greater conspiracy model.

His basic question -- "Who assassinated JFK?" -- and his doesn't-pass-the-laugh-test explanations for posing it -- "There are two separate questions: who did it and who ordered it" -- bespeak a simple-mindedness an underlying ignorance that I for one have neither the time nor the inclination to address.

I see yet another protracted war of words taking shape. I don't want it to happen here. Not again. Not now. Not ever.

This guy has gone to war with "Colby" at EF. I think he would be much happier there.

All readers, please bear in mind: In this and in all other posts over my name, I write for myself only. My posts are not made on behalf of my DPF co-owners, nor do they necessarily reflect their views.

This "guy" is a research attorney who responded to an attack. Your joining the attack is not appreciated. Make your contribution. Then we may have something to discuss. I do not resort to insults. They are beneath me, but apparently not beneath you.

ENOUGH!

DPF has just emerged from a prolonged, often ugly, at times counter-productive series of acrimonious exchanges that too frequently stood in contravention to the avowed purposes and principles of this forum.

I was a part of it. A large part. And while a significant amount of the hostility was the unavoidable by-product of the defense of DPF from hostile penetration, there were also cheap, highly avoidable ego clashes taking place. And I stand guilty of engaging in many of them.

Distinction noted.

Lesson learned.

You came out of the box at DPF with a Conspiracy 101 term paper that at best declares the obvious with an air of discovery, and at worst threatens to consume precious bandwidth with self-described "simplified" exchanges that have no place on a forum dedicated to advanced study of deep politics. Now you shift your focus to responding to "attacks" and boasting of an authoritative command of material that nowhere is in evidence in your posting here to date.

Try again. Submit something of interest. Demonstrate unique, deep insight into our subject matters. Bring new research to the table.

But cut the shit.

And don't for a moment think that you'll be allowed to dumb down DPF with exchanges of the sort that you routinely engaged in with a notorious agent provocateur on another forum.

I have done harm to DPF in the past by encouraging and participating in nonsense that our community of JFK researchers cannot tolerate as the 50th anniversary of the assassination approaches. It was beneath my dignity and that of the forum I helped found.

It will not happen again.

You have another chance. Make the most of it.