11-03-2013, 06:52 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:I'm no botanist, but the vegetation in this image does not strike me as being particularly tropical.
That plus the fact that neither an image nor a verifiable report of LHO at No Name Key has surfaced to date make the statement that this view should be accepted as having been taken "at No Name before anyting else" utterly under-informed and undisciplined -- which is to say, nonsensical.
Starting with "I'm no botanist" and then proceeding to offer a botanist's opinion is the "utterly under-informed and undiscipled" post here Charles.
I can and have been ignoring your caustic, harsh and generally unfriendly approach to anyone's opinions other than your own.... but then you attack me personally when you neither have the skills or desire to create the comparisons I posted and "speculate" along with the other posters... I'm not afraid of you, the playground bully, CD... that you believe you are superior to all is of no consequence to me... takes a BIG MAN to take pot shots at others while hiding behind: "BUT"
then there is your "Who the F$%k do you think your F$%#ing with" BS... which is a quite sad given how truly intelligent, informed and insightful you are about so many things.
I seem to remember when I first got here you were very happy someone with some photographic skills was here to contribute... and I hope whatever I've offered here has increased understanding and clarity on some issues...
Bottom line Charles... there really is no need for you to be a p#ick about discussing OPINIONS... especially if you are not an "expert" in that field.
Lamson uses the same approach... ATTACK THE POSTER rather than discuss the issue.
I would have thought you were past all that Charles. No one should feel reticent to post their thoughts for fear of YOU jumping up and down all over them... think about it.
I also posted a photo of the CIA JM/WAVE HQ in South FL... How "Tropical" does that appear to you?
I've also attached the entire frame...
Why not tell us who took the photo and why Charles... do I need to step you thru the two Oswalds in Japan as well? the DoD backtracking and the health records PROVING there were two of them? You HAVE seen that photo of Oswald in Japan... or at least we are TOLD it is Oswald...
You are aware of EVERY image and EVERY verifiable report out there CD...? I doubt it highly.
===========
To the discussion at hand
It is obvious this "person" looks incredibly similiar to our Oswald.
If is also obvious that this image of Oswald had not been circulated much... or it had never been attributed to Oswald.
Look at the hairline, the nose... if it ain't him... it sure is someone looking eerily similiar...
and that was the entire point here CD... if "LEE" was in No Name or working with the underbelly of the assassination... I doubt highly we'd see too many photos circulating.
I think this is a rare and very interesting find...
Your righteous indignation notwithstanding...
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter

