11-03-2013, 09:07 PM
David Josephs Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:I'm no botanist, but the vegetation in this image does not strike me as being particularly tropical.
That plus the fact that neither an image nor a verifiable report of LHO at No Name Key has surfaced to date make the statement that this view should be accepted as having been taken "at No Name before anyting else" utterly under-informed and undisciplined -- which is to say, nonsensical.
Starting with "I'm no botanist" and then proceeding to offer a botanist's opinion is the "utterly under-informed and undiscipled" post here Charles.
My Dear David,
Your attack here is unprovoked and reeks like a simmering stew that has gone bad and boiled over.
My "I'm no botanist" admission was intended to communicate self-awareness of the limitations of my analysis.
Your boldly confident statement that you would place the view of LHO "at No Name before anyting [sic] else... " was and remains unsupported by any evidence and wholly worthless -- and amounts to de facto disinformation.
We wait in vain for your own acknowledgment of your own limitations.
David Josephs Wrote:I can and have been ignoring your caustic, harsh and generally unfriendly approach to anyone's opinions other than your own.... but then you attack me personally when you neither have the skills or desire to create the comparisons I posted and "speculate" along with the other posters... I'm not afraid of you, the playground bully, CD... that you believe you are superior to all is of no consequence to me... takes a BIG MAN to take pot shots at others while hiding behind: "BUT"
The "Doyle"-esque quality of your prose and reasoning is, well, problematic. It does, however, manage to reveal a rather juvenile perspective on the world. Far from "hiding behind" my qualifier, I used it to underscore the inherent weakness of the botany-related aspect of my objection.
David Josephs Wrote:then there is your "Who the F$%k do you think your F$%#ing with" BS... which is a quite sad given how truly intelligent, informed and insightful you are about so many things.
Stop it, I'm fucking blushing.
David Josephs Wrote:Bottom line Charles... there really is no need for you to be a p#ick about discussing OPINIONS... especially if you are not an "expert" in that field.
I regularly and gratefully defer to expertise -- a quality nowhere to be found in your "before anyting [sic] else "analysis," which remains utterly under-informed and undisciplined -- which is to say, again, nonsensical.
David Josephs Wrote:No one should feel reticent to post their thoughts for fear of YOU jumping up and down all over them... think about it.
By definition, those who would be intimidated by my thoughts and/or the tones in which they are expressed really have little to offer the correspondents and readers of DPF.
YOU think about it!
David Josephs Wrote:I also posted a photo of the CIA JM/WAVE HQ in South FL... How "Tropical" does that appear to you?
My original speculation related to the flora of No Name Key, not mainland Florida. Your statement and question are irrelevant to the issue at hand -- and worthy of description as a "Doyle" moment.
David Josephs Wrote:Why not tell us who took the photo and why Charles...
I haven't the foggiest idea who took the original photo on this thread. Which is one of the reasons why, unlike you, I didn't declare with near-certainty where the photo was taken.
David Josephs Wrote:do I need to step you thru the two Oswalds in Japan as well? the DoD backtracking and the health records PROVING there were two of them? You HAVE seen that photo of Oswald in Japan... or at least we are TOLD it is Oswald...
I don't you need you to tell me ANYTHING about this case.
David Josephs Wrote:You are aware of EVERY image and EVERY verifiable report out there CD...? I doubt it highly.
Classic transference on your part, I'm afraid.
===========
David Josephs Wrote:To the discussion at hand
It is obvious this "person" looks incredibly similiar [sic] to our Oswald.
"Our" Oswald??? Oh dear ... if we break up, who gets him?
By the way, you needn't be Sigmund Freud to appreciate the deeper, revelatory implications of your misspelling -- "similiar" -- above.
David Josephs Wrote:and that was the entire point here CD... if "LEE" was in No Name or working with the underbelly of the assassination... I doubt highly we'd see too many photos circulating.
I think this is a rare and very interesting find...
Your righteous indignation notwithstanding...
The FUCK it was! You declared that the original image here most likely was of LHO at No Name Key. I became righteously indignant in the face of your wholly unjustified certitude. There was no "if" in your original statement.
You missed your calling. You should have been an impressionist; your "Albert Doyle" is spot-on.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene