13-03-2013, 06:48 PM
Greg... you know my work on the forums for many, many years....
As a result.... you know I defend a position vigorously and have on MANY occasions seen how a theory or conclusion of mine was wrong and say so.
Had anyone asked, "So DJ, what makes you think it was No Name before all others?" I would have gladly discussed my feelings and POV on the subject....
CD instead needed to "do his thing".... for whatever personal need, to display his self-perceived superiority...
He was then to only give me 30 seconds more of his time... which he immediately proceeded to ignore
and informed me how he had nothing to learn from me at all...
Sounded an awful lot like a child having a tantrum... so I treated him as such.
So yes Greg...
I let the big bully punch himself out.... was it truly constructive in requesting a response to repost a simple spelling error like he was wearing a badge of honor on his chest?
When that did not get the response he wanted... the tantrum got even uglier with accusations and sucker punches.
As I posted before, MY FAULT... I should have controlled my own responses and not be baited into angry tit-for-tat BS.
You and I have found ourselves in that dance with posters whose names are legendary in JFK circles... and it usually leads nowhere.
What surprises me the most is that a person's body of work is not considered... just THAT COMMENT at THAT MOMENT.... "Up agains the Wall with him!"
Have I ever come across as anything but sincere about what I post and what my conclusions are and why? EVER?
Has anyone who has read my posts here come to the conclusion I am a "third-rate agitator" ? That I try to conceal an agenda?
I will continue to present my POV and support it as best I can....
I will NOT acknowledge holier-than-thou tantrums (Fetzer's demands on Unger as an example) nor have a conversation with a man
who is so sure of his position and knowledge that he has nothing to learn from me... where if you disagree with him you're branded either an idiot or a criminal...
(but he's NOT insulting the "people" whose hearts and minds he is trying to sway.... please)
He seems to forget that my taking on "Doyle" and his cohort regarding Dimona and that awful book helped him to seeing thru "Doyle's" multiple personalities.
==============
In the end, we still have what appears to me as a photo of "an" Oswald with a striking similarity to the man Ruby killed, although the fingers, the height and weight do not align with that man... only the facial features do.
Could THIS photo have been created for some purpose... IDK.
I'm moving on now... I think the idea that only 2 of the tramps were planted while one was actually Abrahms is worth investigating. Those pictured were not Gedney and Doyle... yet SOMEONE was booked and jailed under those names. I would welcome your input on that thread... https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post65565
As a result.... you know I defend a position vigorously and have on MANY occasions seen how a theory or conclusion of mine was wrong and say so.
Had anyone asked, "So DJ, what makes you think it was No Name before all others?" I would have gladly discussed my feelings and POV on the subject....
CD instead needed to "do his thing".... for whatever personal need, to display his self-perceived superiority...
He was then to only give me 30 seconds more of his time... which he immediately proceeded to ignore
and informed me how he had nothing to learn from me at all...
Sounded an awful lot like a child having a tantrum... so I treated him as such.
So yes Greg...
I let the big bully punch himself out.... was it truly constructive in requesting a response to repost a simple spelling error like he was wearing a badge of honor on his chest?
When that did not get the response he wanted... the tantrum got even uglier with accusations and sucker punches.
As I posted before, MY FAULT... I should have controlled my own responses and not be baited into angry tit-for-tat BS.
You and I have found ourselves in that dance with posters whose names are legendary in JFK circles... and it usually leads nowhere.
What surprises me the most is that a person's body of work is not considered... just THAT COMMENT at THAT MOMENT.... "Up agains the Wall with him!"
Have I ever come across as anything but sincere about what I post and what my conclusions are and why? EVER?
Has anyone who has read my posts here come to the conclusion I am a "third-rate agitator" ? That I try to conceal an agenda?
I will continue to present my POV and support it as best I can....
I will NOT acknowledge holier-than-thou tantrums (Fetzer's demands on Unger as an example) nor have a conversation with a man
who is so sure of his position and knowledge that he has nothing to learn from me... where if you disagree with him you're branded either an idiot or a criminal...
(but he's NOT insulting the "people" whose hearts and minds he is trying to sway.... please)
He seems to forget that my taking on "Doyle" and his cohort regarding Dimona and that awful book helped him to seeing thru "Doyle's" multiple personalities.
==============
In the end, we still have what appears to me as a photo of "an" Oswald with a striking similarity to the man Ruby killed, although the fingers, the height and weight do not align with that man... only the facial features do.
Could THIS photo have been created for some purpose... IDK.
I'm moving on now... I think the idea that only 2 of the tramps were planted while one was actually Abrahms is worth investigating. Those pictured were not Gedney and Doyle... yet SOMEONE was booked and jailed under those names. I would welcome your input on that thread... https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post65565
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter