18-03-2013, 08:34 PM
Bill Kelly Wrote:So the unnamed but household word researcher who hijacked the Amnesty Proposal is still running amok and you refuse to name him/her?
Why should the unnamed guilty come forward and confess when you won't even name the guilty among you?
BK
In my opening post on this thread I wrote:
"Please do not waste DPF bandwidth in efforts to convince me to name the name."
Thanks for honoring that, Bill.
For the record, the "running amok" characterization is entirely yours -- which is to say, not mine.
And to point out what should be an obvious distinction: The researcher's bad behavior and that of the killers of JFK are not exactly on a par.
So ... Nice "gotcha" turn of phrase, my friend. Brought a smile to my face.
But not a name to my lips.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene