The Truth and Amnesty Commission for JFK -- A Cautionary Tale

[Bill Kelly]

So the unnamed but household word researcher who hijacked the Amnesty Proposal is still running amok and you refuse to name him/her?

Why should the unnamed guilty come forward and confess when you won't even name the guilty among you?

BK

In my opening post on this thread I wrote:

"Please do not waste DPF bandwidth in efforts to convince me to name the name."

Thanks for honoring that, Bill.

For the record, the "running amok" characterization is entirely yours -- which is to say, not mine.

And to point out what should be an obvious distinction: The researcher's bad behavior and that of the killers of JFK are not exactly on a par.

So ... Nice "gotcha" turn of phrase, my friend. Brought a smile to my face.

But not a name to my lips.

Well, I'm sure whoever this person is has not stopped there, and did not only disrupt the Amnesty project you supported, but has done other mischief and will continue to do more.

You don't have to name the name, it should be a matter of public record, as the participants in the Lancer forum should be identified in their program and John Kelin has written about it, he should know who the guilty party is.

I really don't care as long as they don't interfere with my work.

BK