22-03-2013, 12:19 AM
Looking into the EVIDENCE a little one finds declarations which substantiates there actually having been a shot to the right temple.
Whether that black circle was placed after the fact to hide whatever...or is an accurate depiction of the body at that moment is yet another case of pure speculation,
unless you have the original negative and can make an expert examination, how can anyone state an opinion and be doing anything but guessing?
On this xray there seems to be a number of perfect circles... Mantik, being an expert, is able to tell us the xrays are copies since he handles them himself....
and that the little white circle was NEVER seen by anyone taking or developing xrays. He KNOWS it was added and has the evidence to prove it.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4469[/ATTACH]
If you have access to the Bethesda autopsy negatives... please share them and maybe one of the resident photographic experts can tell you WHAT it is or isn't.
Until then... below is some of the evidence I mentioned that supports there actually being a shot at that spot... the collage I posted contrasts Groden with Fox where in some cases we see the circle and others we do not.
I hope you have success in determining WHAT it is from 10th generation internet files with 72dpi resolution and no negative..
I for one would be very interested in learning WHAT that was since I've been analyzing those photos for over 10 years and STILL have to remind myself we have no idea of the chain of evidence for these images.
Peace
DJ
1) Naturally occurring:
Lt Col Daniel Marvin also made contact with Dennis David, a friend of Pitzer who told him that Pitzer had shown him photographs and film of Kennedy's autopsy, depicting a small bullet hole in JFK's right temple and a large exit wound in the back of the head.
Wehle said he was an observer during the later stages of the autopsy. "(Wehle) noticed a slight
bruise over the right temple of the President but did not see any significant damage to any other part
of the head.
* O'Donnell further told the ARRB that one of the autopsy photos Knudsen showed him showed what appeared to be an entry wound in the right temple. This is key because there were several reports out of Dallas of a small wound in one of the temples. O'Donnell's account strongly tends to confirm those reports. Also, a defect consistent with a wound of entry can be seen in the right temple area on the autopsy x-rays, according to three doctors who have examined them (one of whom is an expert in neuroanatomy and another of whom is a board-certified radiologist).
* Tom Robinson, the mortician, confirmed what he had already told the HSCA on the issue of a small wound in the temple, namely, that he saw a small hole in the area of the right temple, and that he filled it with wax. Although Robinson speculated the small hole was made by an exiting fragment, the hole is strong evidence of a shot from the front in light of the reports of a large wound of exit in the back of the head and in light of the other accounts of an entry-like wound in one of the temples. Indeed, White House press man Malcolm Kilduff told reporters at Parkland Hospital that afternoon that Dr. Burkley told him a bullet entered the right temple, and Kilduff pointed to his own right temple to illustrate the trajectory. This was all captured on film. One of the reporters who attended that press conference wrote in his notes "bullet entered right temple" (or "entered right temple").
[size=12][/SIZE]
Whether that black circle was placed after the fact to hide whatever...or is an accurate depiction of the body at that moment is yet another case of pure speculation,
unless you have the original negative and can make an expert examination, how can anyone state an opinion and be doing anything but guessing?
On this xray there seems to be a number of perfect circles... Mantik, being an expert, is able to tell us the xrays are copies since he handles them himself....
and that the little white circle was NEVER seen by anyone taking or developing xrays. He KNOWS it was added and has the evidence to prove it.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4469[/ATTACH]
If you have access to the Bethesda autopsy negatives... please share them and maybe one of the resident photographic experts can tell you WHAT it is or isn't.
Until then... below is some of the evidence I mentioned that supports there actually being a shot at that spot... the collage I posted contrasts Groden with Fox where in some cases we see the circle and others we do not.
I hope you have success in determining WHAT it is from 10th generation internet files with 72dpi resolution and no negative..
I for one would be very interested in learning WHAT that was since I've been analyzing those photos for over 10 years and STILL have to remind myself we have no idea of the chain of evidence for these images.
Peace
DJ
1) Naturally occurring:
[size=12]http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/White%20%...ennedy.pdf
12/17/63
[/SIZE][size=12]Washington, Dec. 16 - The (FBI) report takes a firm position against various reports that at least one of the bullets that hit Mr.[/SIZE]
[size=12]Kennedy had come from in front of him.
Such a theory would conflict with the fact that Oswald was allegedly firing from a window above and behind the President.
The FBI report said the shots came from that window. It said Mr. Kennedy was hit by two bullets, one where the right shoulder
joins the neck and the other in the right temple.
[/SIZE][size=12]New York Times
[/SIZE]----------------------
7/11/66
... There exists material evidence - the photographs and X rays taken at Bethesda - which could settle almost all the majordifferences of opinion concerning the wounds. The photographs would pinpoint the location of the back wound ... [They] could
also show alleged wounds unaccounted for in the autopsy, such as the exit wound of a bullet entering the throat, and they would
reveal details of the complex wound in Kennedy's temple. And the X rays would determine, once and forever, if any unaccounted
for bullets or bullet fragments lodged in Kennedy's body. Bullets are as clear in an X ray as a spoon ...
The Nation, p. 45, Jacob Cohen
==============
David W. Mantik
Physician with two PhD's at the faculty of Loma Linda University Medical Center in the department of Radiation Medicin. Has made an extensive study of the medical evidence, the autopsy photographs and X-rays. Mantik tells of the evidence that he found for two simutaneous shots in JFK's head, one from behind and one from the front in the right temple.
Lt Col Daniel Marvin also made contact with Dennis David, a friend of Pitzer who told him that Pitzer had shown him photographs and film of Kennedy's autopsy, depicting a small bullet hole in JFK's right temple and a large exit wound in the back of the head.
Wehle said he was an observer during the later stages of the autopsy. "(Wehle) noticed a slight
bruise over the right temple of the President but did not see any significant damage to any other part
of the head.
* O'Donnell further told the ARRB that one of the autopsy photos Knudsen showed him showed what appeared to be an entry wound in the right temple. This is key because there were several reports out of Dallas of a small wound in one of the temples. O'Donnell's account strongly tends to confirm those reports. Also, a defect consistent with a wound of entry can be seen in the right temple area on the autopsy x-rays, according to three doctors who have examined them (one of whom is an expert in neuroanatomy and another of whom is a board-certified radiologist).
* Tom Robinson, the mortician, confirmed what he had already told the HSCA on the issue of a small wound in the temple, namely, that he saw a small hole in the area of the right temple, and that he filled it with wax. Although Robinson speculated the small hole was made by an exiting fragment, the hole is strong evidence of a shot from the front in light of the reports of a large wound of exit in the back of the head and in light of the other accounts of an entry-like wound in one of the temples. Indeed, White House press man Malcolm Kilduff told reporters at Parkland Hospital that afternoon that Dr. Burkley told him a bullet entered the right temple, and Kilduff pointed to his own right temple to illustrate the trajectory. This was all captured on film. One of the reporters who attended that press conference wrote in his notes "bullet entered right temple" (or "entered right temple").
[size=12][/SIZE]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter