24-03-2013, 09:38 PM
Perhaps off topic...
I've been reading a lot about the JFK assassination the past week and one thing which struck me was the quality of research and analysis by the independent researchers. Admittedly this has had a 50 year trajectory and I suppose new pieces of the puzzle are still being added. Interested persons can learn the names of those in the cover up and many in the operation (mechanics, managers). The entire event has been framed rather well in the over arching political context.
In thinking about 9/11... I see similarities... but much more differences. We don't see the names suggested of the mechanics... We don't see the sort of complexity of a conspiracy that JFK was... despite the fact that it was physically a far more complex and destructive event.
If one considers JFK a coup (which I do) 9/11 clearly was not... as the coup was pretty much in control and had gotten what they were after once JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcom X were killed. Nothing stood in the way of the MIC, the generals and the ascendency of the empire. The communist boogie man was gone... and perhaps a new raison d'etre would be needed. But it seems clear that the deal was simply to carry on with more of the same... and the coup used the same sort of tactics and the mighty wultizter to forge ahead into the ME and the Caucuses... where they have been stirring up trouble (or brewing it) for decades.
9/11 was not a coup... there was no need to re direct the nation's trajectory which appeared to be turning toward peace. There was perhaps simply a need to inject the MIC with some trillions and a new enemy. No way Jose was the MIC and the Pentagon going to downsize... and allow the sort of redirection JFK represented and died for... Perhaps it was more of a reminder the people... We're not finished with the manifest destiny of the empire.
Take note.
I've been reading a lot about the JFK assassination the past week and one thing which struck me was the quality of research and analysis by the independent researchers. Admittedly this has had a 50 year trajectory and I suppose new pieces of the puzzle are still being added. Interested persons can learn the names of those in the cover up and many in the operation (mechanics, managers). The entire event has been framed rather well in the over arching political context.
In thinking about 9/11... I see similarities... but much more differences. We don't see the names suggested of the mechanics... We don't see the sort of complexity of a conspiracy that JFK was... despite the fact that it was physically a far more complex and destructive event.
If one considers JFK a coup (which I do) 9/11 clearly was not... as the coup was pretty much in control and had gotten what they were after once JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcom X were killed. Nothing stood in the way of the MIC, the generals and the ascendency of the empire. The communist boogie man was gone... and perhaps a new raison d'etre would be needed. But it seems clear that the deal was simply to carry on with more of the same... and the coup used the same sort of tactics and the mighty wultizter to forge ahead into the ME and the Caucuses... where they have been stirring up trouble (or brewing it) for decades.
9/11 was not a coup... there was no need to re direct the nation's trajectory which appeared to be turning toward peace. There was perhaps simply a need to inject the MIC with some trillions and a new enemy. No way Jose was the MIC and the Pentagon going to downsize... and allow the sort of redirection JFK represented and died for... Perhaps it was more of a reminder the people... We're not finished with the manifest destiny of the empire.
Take note.