26-03-2013, 02:08 AM
Jim DiEugenio, on 29 January 2012 - 10:22 AM, Education Forum , said: "As per the blown our right side, I think most of us believe there were two shots to the head: one through the right temple and one from behind. This had to result in extensive brain damage." If Jim is correct in his observation that most believe two shots struck the presidents head, why do you suppose that is? As for the dot. If you think it is a point of entry than we are back to the fact that it must have originated the area of the South Knoll. You cant' have it both ways. You can't have a shot from the front striking him in the frontal bone, and striking him in the temple. They are not the same area. Or is this what you are suggesting, that two bullets struck him from the front, one above the right eye in the area of the dot, and one in the temple just in front of the right ear? As to the pre autopsy alterations, there may be plenty of conjecture about this, but I have not seen any more "compelling evidence" for it, than I have for the rear entry wound in the occipital area. In fact I find the evidence for that more "compelling". It seems to me that if the autopsy doctors were lying about it, or just making stuff up to please their masters, they wouldn't have been so adamant about it's location. They would have gone along with the change in location so as to better fit the single shooter from behind theory, rather than resisting.