27-03-2013, 02:12 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:What doe Chomsky have to feaar? He does his master's bidding. And trust me noone is "afraid" of him. He's a left gatekeeper. Have you read his views on the assassination of JFK....that would be a good place to start if you are unaware of this. He's even written a BOOK saying no conspiracy.
I do not like the insults and ad homs here either.
Re 9-11 we agree to disagree. What makes you think many have not been "silenced"?
Dawn
Chomsky can speak for himself. I think his position is that the bigger problem is the overarching conspiracy of capitalism and its fascist militarism which acts in all manner of unethical ways and very much predicable responses to world events.
In a sense the details don't seem to matter to him. And that may be expedient because his pitch is against capitalism and militarism. These themes are ever present regardless of who has leadership positions... or sponsors, managers and mechanics the CD model. The names change, positions passed along in old boys clubs and so forth... and identifying one set of criminals is not going to change the system which is what needs to be changed.
He's hardly a gate keeper which is a silly insult.
The 9/11 debate itself is a microcosm of the bigger theme (Russian dolls?).. the focus on CD is a distraction to how the event was used by TPTB to advance the agenda. Finding conspirators of the inside job and bringing them to justice will not guaranty that the capitalist fascist system will fall. New insiders will replace the fallen and carry on doing to the same thing.
Chomsky's analysis not providing cover for the coup... he identifies them and what they predictable did post 9/11.... which to him is the take away... not nailing insiders. The system thrives on violence. He wants to change that.
As for JFK his view is probably that the same people were in power before and after the assassination... the details don't matter as much as the nature of the state.
My take.