06-04-2013, 10:35 AM
Robert Paulsen's synopsis of Sibel Edmonds' hypothesis of the evolution of Gladio B provides illumination of a number of concepts developed in the deep political analysis of the last quarter century.
Consider Paulsen's fertile three paragraphs replicated here:
Getting back to Qadi's Albanian connection, Edmonds explains that the biggest focus of the Gladio B operatives from the early to late 90's was the Balkans. This includes not only Qadi and Çatlı's networks, but also the Fethullah Gulen network discussed in Part One. At this time, many Albanians coming into Chicago were some of the "most ferocious and strongest" mafia operators in the US. Even Italians wouldn't mess with these guys. The FBI set up major arrests that would consistently be thwarted because the State Department would tell them these guys had diplomatic immunity! Why did they do this? Time magazine's 2002 person of the year, FBI whistleblower Colleen Rowley believes that it's because there were too many moles in the FBI, that the CIA had penetrated the FBI on behalf of the State Department. The CIA-State Department would "tip off informants" in cases known to the NSWBC of impending sting operations by the FBI. This was really the big underlying problem that Edmonds had to deal with during her employment as an FBI translator. It was not the bureaucratic nobody Mike Feghali that she mentions in her book, it was the CIA-State Department moles within the FBI.
After her termination from the FBI, Edmonds put the pieces of the puzzle together with her NSWBC organization. She knew the 9/11 Commission was "bull" because of all the facts that were intentionally omitted from their report. Time person of the year Colleen Rowley was not even going to be interviewed by the Commission. Rowley, Wright, Vincent; these were all agents 20+ years on the force. Edmonds then went to the media to protest this oversight. She was able to tell her story to the Commission through a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) so that no operatives identities would be compromised. All of these agents she mentioned, as well as Tony Shaffer of Operation Able Danger went on record saying there was a huge 9/11 cover-up! While this may seem like a clear case of Bush administration malfeasance to many, Edmonds clarifies that many of these investigations were stymied during the late 90's, which would implicate the Clinton administration as well.
It is this last point that Americans find especially hard to digest because we are conditioned to think along the lines of a black hat/white hat mentality. It's so much easier to be partisan rather than dig deeper to find the darker truth that intersects across party lines. The classic example is the story of Watergate and how it was covered by Bob Woodward and the Washington Post. That story seems pretty clear-cut, but if they really got Watergate, why didn't they get Iran/contra? Or did they really get Watergate? It seems from Sibel Edmonds perspective that when you really get the story, the way Gary Webb did with Iran/contra, you don't become a multi-millionaire entrenched in the system like Woodward, you get marginalized like Webb. Corbett concurs, noting that the Watergate burglary was purposely screwed up and Woodward had the story handed to him on a silver platter.
The Balkans. Clinton spoke at the USNA Commencement May 1994 defensively claiming he could not unilaterally arm the Bosniansbut he had no need, having allowed Iran to do that. He would use Wesley Clark at Waco and in the former Yugoslavia. While the extant treatise on Naval production of assassins by demonizing targets applies in spades to Koresh and the ninety civilians massacred including three dozen women and children.
CIA moles penetrating? Dulles had his people in all the agencies. Helms had ten on Garrison's staff (see James DiEugenio, Destiny Betrayed, 2012). Rowley would know about FBI acting against its chartershe complained to Mueller and was retaliated against, while Obama kept Mueller on for two additional years.
FBI hounded John O'Neill, stole his confidential files, and though he tried to warn of an attack, he was its victim in the towers' collapse. FBI would refuse to respond to the warnings of confidential informant Carol Howe and her BATF handler agent Angela Finney, and another false-flag op went down with OKCBomb. FBI Kalstrom would prosecute investigators who found traces of explosives on seats recovered from TWA 800, evidence of the shoulder-launched missile from the fast boat on the radar track.
Edmonds' reference to Baluchistan echoes that of Jayna Davis, whose insistence there was a Middle Eastern John Doe No. 2 was vehemently denied by an FBI which destroyed motel records and found nothing amiss in the death of the waitress who witnessed Andreas Carl Strassmeier reconnoitering targets with McVeigh. The foreign (German) intelligence asset leaves the country with immunity.
Attempts by Curt Weldon to pursue Able Danger were shut down. Edmonds' message, says Paulsen, is:
It's so much easier to be partisan rather than dig deeper to find the darker truth that intersects across party lines.
Which we see in Terry Reed and John Cummings, Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA, SPI/Shapolsky, 1994.
The example of Watergate is of note: Helms sabotaged Nixon with the addition of McCord, Sturgis, Hunt, Barker et al on the crew. DiEugenio puts McCord with Phillips running the FPCC op using Oswald.
And of course the placement of Dulles as central to Gladio's origination.
There was enough tension during the Cold War. It was an armature lending itself to triggering of flashpoints. Now the model is the War on Terror yet the AP stylebook eschews "Islamist" and the DCI is a Muslim. Are we witnessing the Gladio use of Mujahadeen with greater finesse.
Edmonds' mention of the treatment of Gary Webb and the use of FTW for interview quotes brings up the comments of former US Customs officer John Carman here not so long ago.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post50250
Consider Paulsen's fertile three paragraphs replicated here:
Getting back to Qadi's Albanian connection, Edmonds explains that the biggest focus of the Gladio B operatives from the early to late 90's was the Balkans. This includes not only Qadi and Çatlı's networks, but also the Fethullah Gulen network discussed in Part One. At this time, many Albanians coming into Chicago were some of the "most ferocious and strongest" mafia operators in the US. Even Italians wouldn't mess with these guys. The FBI set up major arrests that would consistently be thwarted because the State Department would tell them these guys had diplomatic immunity! Why did they do this? Time magazine's 2002 person of the year, FBI whistleblower Colleen Rowley believes that it's because there were too many moles in the FBI, that the CIA had penetrated the FBI on behalf of the State Department. The CIA-State Department would "tip off informants" in cases known to the NSWBC of impending sting operations by the FBI. This was really the big underlying problem that Edmonds had to deal with during her employment as an FBI translator. It was not the bureaucratic nobody Mike Feghali that she mentions in her book, it was the CIA-State Department moles within the FBI.
After her termination from the FBI, Edmonds put the pieces of the puzzle together with her NSWBC organization. She knew the 9/11 Commission was "bull" because of all the facts that were intentionally omitted from their report. Time person of the year Colleen Rowley was not even going to be interviewed by the Commission. Rowley, Wright, Vincent; these were all agents 20+ years on the force. Edmonds then went to the media to protest this oversight. She was able to tell her story to the Commission through a SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) so that no operatives identities would be compromised. All of these agents she mentioned, as well as Tony Shaffer of Operation Able Danger went on record saying there was a huge 9/11 cover-up! While this may seem like a clear case of Bush administration malfeasance to many, Edmonds clarifies that many of these investigations were stymied during the late 90's, which would implicate the Clinton administration as well.
It is this last point that Americans find especially hard to digest because we are conditioned to think along the lines of a black hat/white hat mentality. It's so much easier to be partisan rather than dig deeper to find the darker truth that intersects across party lines. The classic example is the story of Watergate and how it was covered by Bob Woodward and the Washington Post. That story seems pretty clear-cut, but if they really got Watergate, why didn't they get Iran/contra? Or did they really get Watergate? It seems from Sibel Edmonds perspective that when you really get the story, the way Gary Webb did with Iran/contra, you don't become a multi-millionaire entrenched in the system like Woodward, you get marginalized like Webb. Corbett concurs, noting that the Watergate burglary was purposely screwed up and Woodward had the story handed to him on a silver platter.
The Balkans. Clinton spoke at the USNA Commencement May 1994 defensively claiming he could not unilaterally arm the Bosniansbut he had no need, having allowed Iran to do that. He would use Wesley Clark at Waco and in the former Yugoslavia. While the extant treatise on Naval production of assassins by demonizing targets applies in spades to Koresh and the ninety civilians massacred including three dozen women and children.
CIA moles penetrating? Dulles had his people in all the agencies. Helms had ten on Garrison's staff (see James DiEugenio, Destiny Betrayed, 2012). Rowley would know about FBI acting against its chartershe complained to Mueller and was retaliated against, while Obama kept Mueller on for two additional years.
FBI hounded John O'Neill, stole his confidential files, and though he tried to warn of an attack, he was its victim in the towers' collapse. FBI would refuse to respond to the warnings of confidential informant Carol Howe and her BATF handler agent Angela Finney, and another false-flag op went down with OKCBomb. FBI Kalstrom would prosecute investigators who found traces of explosives on seats recovered from TWA 800, evidence of the shoulder-launched missile from the fast boat on the radar track.
Edmonds' reference to Baluchistan echoes that of Jayna Davis, whose insistence there was a Middle Eastern John Doe No. 2 was vehemently denied by an FBI which destroyed motel records and found nothing amiss in the death of the waitress who witnessed Andreas Carl Strassmeier reconnoitering targets with McVeigh. The foreign (German) intelligence asset leaves the country with immunity.
Attempts by Curt Weldon to pursue Able Danger were shut down. Edmonds' message, says Paulsen, is:
It's so much easier to be partisan rather than dig deeper to find the darker truth that intersects across party lines.
Which we see in Terry Reed and John Cummings, Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA, SPI/Shapolsky, 1994.
The example of Watergate is of note: Helms sabotaged Nixon with the addition of McCord, Sturgis, Hunt, Barker et al on the crew. DiEugenio puts McCord with Phillips running the FPCC op using Oswald.
And of course the placement of Dulles as central to Gladio's origination.
There was enough tension during the Cold War. It was an armature lending itself to triggering of flashpoints. Now the model is the War on Terror yet the AP stylebook eschews "Islamist" and the DCI is a Muslim. Are we witnessing the Gladio use of Mujahadeen with greater finesse.
Edmonds' mention of the treatment of Gary Webb and the use of FTW for interview quotes brings up the comments of former US Customs officer John Carman here not so long ago.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post50250