09-04-2013, 02:04 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Kenneth Kapel Wrote:Chomsky is so right on this topic, how can he be so wrong in regard to JFK & 9-11 ? Chomsky's anti Americanism and anti capitalism has made him a millionaire, if he pursued JFK & 9-11 in the same way his income and availability would be curtailed by his intelligence masters. Doesn't MIT receive buckets of federal grants ?Of course and MIT is filled with spooks. His "intelligence masters" have SO influenced him that he finally wrote a pro Warren Commission book some years back.
Of course he is charming, David. I met him in the early 70's. He was speaking at MIT along with Carl Oglesby...(odd coupling) ...and found him smart and compelling. I even have his books (Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, and After The Cataclysm).
So he's a charming man.
But then so is Obama.
I rest my case.
Dawn
ps David, that's ok. But now you owe me a drink, a virtual one I suppose.
Know any good cyber bars? I'll make it a double.
Obama is a glad-handing duplicitous politician - a place-man for the old buzz cut cold warrior Zbigniew Brzezinski, and his mates at the Trilateral Commission. Chomsky is unquestionably wrong about JFK and 911. I just don't buy that he is a bought and paid for gatekeeper. But that's just me.
Anyway, we'll agree to disagree over ice cold rum daiqruiri's, okay.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14