Altgens destroys Zapruder: Z film a blatant fraud

[Myra Bronstein]

Charles...there are NUMEROUS PROOFS OF CONSPIRACY in the JFK
case...none dependent on others. The Zfilm fakery is JUST ONE of them.
Let's not exclude it because there are lots of others.

Jack

Jack,

I'm super-cautious when dealing with Z-film alteration arguments because of the public relations factor.

When we attempt to demonstrate the proof of conspiracy to honorable, open audiences, we are best served by presenting evidence that has endured over time, is relatively simple to explain, and is impossible to refute honestly.

Compared to expositions of the conspiracy-proving demolition of the SBT and the condition of the brain and skull, Z-film alteration arguments are relatively complex and demanding. And to be fair, while I lean heavily toward acceptance of the alteration hypothesis as valid, I remain unconvinced of its value as a weapon in our struggle to disseminate the conspiracy truth to the uninitiated.

George Michael and I disagreed on alteration: He fully accepted it as true, while then, as now, I'm not quite there.

But in all honesty, my hesitation has more to do with my reluctance to embrace alteration as a p.r. tool than with any problems with the hypothesis on its own merits.

We don't have to be in lock step. Some of us can discuss the blatant fraud that is the Z-film, while others can focus on topics that most interest them.