24-05-2013, 10:17 AM
David Guyatt Wrote:I am aware of the sensitivity of this subject and ask that readers understand that I am posting the following in the spirit of understanding.My guess would be that the victim was already dead after they rammed the car into him. If he is dead there is no heart beat and no blood circulating and therefore no blood spray when the arteries are cut.
Picture of killer after the murder:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4783[/ATTACH]
And
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4784[/ATTACH]
And
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4785[/ATTACH]
Butchery has just taken place, with the victim's head decapitated by a meat cleaver.
No blood on the clothes of either perp is visible. No blood pooling around the body of the victim is visible.
The volume and spray of blood jetting from the arteries in the neck would've, surely, resulted in blood everywhere - on their clothes, on the ground around the body?
The only blood visible is on the hands of the main perpetrator, but even that does not seem to be entirely true?
What's going on here?
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.