24-05-2013, 03:28 PM
Typically disgraceful editorial from the NYT.
Why are Americans singled out for special treatment and protection by Obama?
The only morally acceptable statement is: it is not constitutional for the government to target and kill any person with a drone or with a shotgun without due process.
Quote:Mr. Obama did say that he does "not believe it would be constitutional for the government to target and kill any U.S. citizen with a drone or with a shotgun without due process." Nor, he said, "should any president deploy armed drones over U.S. soil." He also said that he had informed Congress about every planned drone strike outside of Iraq and Afghanistan and that he had ordered his administration to prepare a strict, written set of rules for targeted killings in the future. (Still, it was disturbing to hear that the rules would be in a classified document, not be shared with the public. It's hard to believe that some version could not be declassified.)
Why are Americans singled out for special treatment and protection by Obama?
The only morally acceptable statement is: it is not constitutional for the government to target and kill any person with a drone or with a shotgun without due process.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war