DiEugenio rips Bill O a new one

[Dawn Meredith]

DiEugenio got booted from the Education Forum.


Very bad move based on what I see as a sculpted bias. To remove DiEugenio based on one-sided rules of conduct superficiality is to enforce content restriction under the guise of site moderation. While, like Simkin, I also disagree with DiEugenio on the matter of Mary Meyer I am wise enough to see that Mr D is a formidable assassination researcher who brings a lot more to the equation than the narrow logic that is being used to remove him. By far! To remove DiEugenio on rules of conduct when the real matter is obviously an issue of facts and opinion is to ban the strongest and most powerful tea in order to promote the weakest. While I somewhat agree with Simkin on Mr D's tendency to go too far on certain assassination issues and perhaps deny real evidence by means of hyperscrutiny of it parts, banning him is a much worse violation and will come at the expense of some of the best research pure gold available. Let the rule be free speech even if it requires having to put up with contentious disagreement. The alternative, as shown, comes at too high a price to knowledge. Common sense should make it obvious that banning the author of 'Destiny Betrayed' is bad move for whatever the reason and petty dislike of his methods is no justification. Lifton is a fool for not seeing that Priscilla Johnson McMillan is an obvious conscious and willing CIA tool. Where would we be without DiEugenio showing that?

If he got booted over the Pricilla JOhnson McMillan episode with Lifton and Carroll, that tells me a lot about THEM, that forum. Again.

Dawn