Altgens destroys Zapruder: Z film a blatant fraud

[Paul Rigby]

How easy is to the prove the Zapruder film's fraudulence? Surprisingly so.

Moorman’s photograph of the presidential limousine on Elm.

It is instanced here to show Zapruder’s alleged position & line of sight; and the height of the motorcycle outriders relative to the presidential limousine and the height of its occupants.

This photo is held by anti-alterationists to correspond to Z315-6.

http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/gal...m=11&pos=4

Now for a crop, focusing on the presidential limousine’s right side, of the most famous photograph attributed to Associated Press man James Altgens.

This photograph is held by anti-alterationists to correspond to Zapruder frame 255.

Note the position alongside the Lincoln convertible of motorcycle outrider James Chaney – he has passed Kennedy and is turning to his left rear:

http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/gal...um=2&pos=5

Now let us turn to the corresponding Z frame, 255:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z255.jpg

Chaney has vanished!

Now for Commission Exhibit 698, a photo taken from a height many times that of Zappy on the pedestal overlooking Elm. Note the position of the motorcycle outriders, and how a camera position much more elevated than Z's struggled to clear the police outriders to give an unimpeded view of the limousine's occupants. The horizontal distances from camera to presidential limo are not that far apart:

http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc...97-698.pdf

How the forgers resolved the Chaney problem is pretty obvious from the most cursory inspections of the Z main bill and its supporting acts: in the former, they removed progressively more of the foreground (the street and the north curb of Elm); and commenced the latter after the moment captured in Altgens' still.