13-06-2013, 08:46 PM
Hi David,
Good to see you're here too. Always a pleasure to read your detailed posts.
You wrote: "If Humes did what Reed/Robinson say he did....How is it possible to reliably use these NON-ALTERED yet completely fraudulent medical records to determine the rest of shots?"
I assume you're referring to Robinson's comment about Humes and Boswell enlarging the head wound and Reed saying that Humes used a saw? I'll be honest with you, David, I have absolutely no idea how Horne construed this as something sinister since enlarging the head wound was necessary to remove the brain which is a normal part of an autopsy. Of course the autopsy doctors altered the body. It's not possible to conduct an autopsy without doing so! Here's what Humes said in his WC testimony:
Dr. HUMES: ...To better examine the situation with regard to the skull, at this time, Boswell and I extended the lacerations of the scalp which were at the margins of this wound, down in the direction of both of the President's ears. At that point, we had even a better appreciation of the extensive damage which had been done to the skull by this injury.
We had to do virtually no work with a saw to remove these Portions of the skull, they came apart in our hands very easily, and we attempted to further examine the brain, and seek specifically this fragment which was the one we felt to be of a size which would permit us to recover it. (2H354)
We can see quite clearly in the above passage that Humes is talking about enlarging the head wound to get to the brain and mentions using a saw. He doesn't say they didn't use a saw as (IIRC) Horne alleges, he says they did VIRTUALLY no work with the saw. IOW a little work with the saw.
Horne and Lifton are not right. The body alteration hypothesis is baseless bullshit with absolutely no credible supporting evidence. So therefore Kellerman did not organize any "charade". If Kellerman was part of some cover-up why would he even mention hearing a flurry of shots let alone insisting to Specter that there had to be more than three? And why would he describe an exit in the rear instead of one on the right side which was what the official story called for?
I stand by what I wrote. I see no reason for Kellerman to have lied. And I see ZERO credible evidence of his involvement in any kind of hankey pankey at Bethesda.
With regard to the crushed Vomer, I would need to do more research on that point before I could make any informed comment as to what that suggests.
Good to see you're here too. Always a pleasure to read your detailed posts.
You wrote: "If Humes did what Reed/Robinson say he did....How is it possible to reliably use these NON-ALTERED yet completely fraudulent medical records to determine the rest of shots?"
I assume you're referring to Robinson's comment about Humes and Boswell enlarging the head wound and Reed saying that Humes used a saw? I'll be honest with you, David, I have absolutely no idea how Horne construed this as something sinister since enlarging the head wound was necessary to remove the brain which is a normal part of an autopsy. Of course the autopsy doctors altered the body. It's not possible to conduct an autopsy without doing so! Here's what Humes said in his WC testimony:
Dr. HUMES: ...To better examine the situation with regard to the skull, at this time, Boswell and I extended the lacerations of the scalp which were at the margins of this wound, down in the direction of both of the President's ears. At that point, we had even a better appreciation of the extensive damage which had been done to the skull by this injury.
We had to do virtually no work with a saw to remove these Portions of the skull, they came apart in our hands very easily, and we attempted to further examine the brain, and seek specifically this fragment which was the one we felt to be of a size which would permit us to recover it. (2H354)
We can see quite clearly in the above passage that Humes is talking about enlarging the head wound to get to the brain and mentions using a saw. He doesn't say they didn't use a saw as (IIRC) Horne alleges, he says they did VIRTUALLY no work with the saw. IOW a little work with the saw.
Horne and Lifton are not right. The body alteration hypothesis is baseless bullshit with absolutely no credible supporting evidence. So therefore Kellerman did not organize any "charade". If Kellerman was part of some cover-up why would he even mention hearing a flurry of shots let alone insisting to Specter that there had to be more than three? And why would he describe an exit in the rear instead of one on the right side which was what the official story called for?
I stand by what I wrote. I see no reason for Kellerman to have lied. And I see ZERO credible evidence of his involvement in any kind of hankey pankey at Bethesda.
With regard to the crushed Vomer, I would need to do more research on that point before I could make any informed comment as to what that suggests.