19-06-2013, 07:59 PM
Gordon Gray Wrote:What you don't seem to grasp is that it is possible for there to be missing bone without corresponding missing scalp. Dr. Aguilar's explanation is vey clear to me. Kennedy's hair and scalp covered the missing bone in the top of the head. Most likely obscured the entry wound in the right temple region.
Mr. Gray... there is very little concerning this subject that I fail to grasp.... the Lateral xrays and its analysis reveal that there is NO BONE forward of the coronal suture... anywhere.
and the AP versus Lateral xrays show completely different things....
The area where Mantik lets us know correspionds to 5 inches of bone does not show up on the AP image...
We are not talking about covering missing bone... we are talking about the xrays OF THE BONES... and how they are mutually exclusive.
This frontal xray does NOT show 5 inches of bone or even a significant amount of bone in the right rear "Parkland/Dallas" exit location. Between C and D we SHOULD SEE an incredibly white solid bone area as we see in the "patched" lateral xray but we dont because that area was indeed patched... as it there was no bone there... it was blown OUT.
The DARK AREA in front of the skull means there is nothing there... no bone, not brains, nothing.... whereas in the frontal xray.. that area obviously has bone (the photos/drawings of the "brain" also show an intact left hemisphere front to back... if there was brain there in the fronal xray it would darken the effect of having bone both at the front and back.. it does not... this suggests the brain was either gone, more damaged than the record states (duh) of the xrays were altered.
Finally... do you not find it interesting that the xray show such a dark area, in almost a perfect circle... right where we see a number of references to the right frontal shot entry location... and is the starting point of the fragments, the real fragments. I may have not gotten the xray in perfect alignment with the photo... but it's very close.
Gordon... not a soul in Dallas puts any damage to the front of the coronal suture... whereas the lateral xray shows the opposite... AND is a proven fraud.
To recap - wounds don't match, 3 casket entries, Humes lying about WHEN he sees the body, if 6:45 from the ARRB is correct, and not 7:35... how did JFK get into the morgue BEFORE the ambulance and motorcade even arrived at the FRONT of Bethesda... (by the way, you might enjoy this Finck report to Blumberg... "Humes told me... no sawing of the skull was necessary"
=================================
As an aside... Ebersole was shown by Reed to have lied a bit to the HSCA... specifically about his carrying xray cassettes to the 4th floor... but this is what he says when he sees JFK's body:
Upon removing the body from the coffin, the anterior aspect, the only things noticeable were a small irregular ecumonic area above the super ecolobular ridge and a neatly sutured transverse surgical wound across the low neck.
(wonder who would have sutured that wound... as it has never been shown to have been sewn up)
Q: Did you (REED) see any wounds on President Kennedy's throat -
A: Yes, I did.
Q: - in the front?
A: Yes, I did.
Q: Anterior throat. What - Could you describe what you saw?
A: A large, gaping wound. Approximately
seven centimeters in width - in length. Excuse
me, in length. And about two centimeters in width.
Ebersole: (in the entire HSCA deposition the names REED nor CUSTER do not appear, at all.)
Let's alos remember that the SS took a total of 11 xrays with them according the FBI report....
So prior to starting the autopsy we were asked to x ray the body to determine
the presence of a bullet. We took several X rays of the skull, chest, trunk.
These were taken in the autopsy room on the autopsy table. They were hand
carried by me in their cassettes to what we designate as Tower Four, the forth
floor of the hospital, handled by a dark room technician, given back to me and
hand carried by me to the autopsy room.
The initial films showed the usual
metallic fragments in the skull but no evidence of a slug, a bullet. This was a
little bit disconcerting. We were asked by the Secret Service agents present to
repeat the films and did so Once again there was no evidence of a bullet. I
assume you are familiar with portable X ray It is not the kind that gives a fine
diagnostic but it is helpful in picking up metallic fragments. It would stand
out like a sore thumb either intact or shattered.
Page 67 line 15 of Reed's ARRB testomony states that he did not hear the Secret Service ever make any requests regarding xrays... and Dr. Ebersole was there as well ... AND he states that Ebersole did NOT carry cassettes to the 4th floor... not that he sees.
So what is Ebersole doing here?? was he involved in the taking of xrays independent of REED and CUSTER?
===================================
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4873[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4874[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter