Morley v. CIA

[Phil Dragoo]

There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.

http://www.maebrussell.com/Prouty/Harry ...ticle.html

[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]

[size=12]16 Questions
On The Assassination[/SIZE]

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]

by Bertrand Russell

[B]The Minority of One, September 6, 1964, pp. 6-8.[/B]

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]



http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/16questions.htm

Paragraph Five:

In the name of national security, the Commission's hearings were held in secret, thereby continuing the policy which has marked the entire course of the case. This prompts my second question: If, as we are told, Oswald was the lone assassin, where is the issue of national security? Indeed, precisely the same question must be put here as was posed in France during the Dreyfus case: If the Government is so certain of its case, why has it conducted all its inquiries in the strictest secrecy?

Just as Joannides was up to his rictus grin in the assassination while presenting himself as Mortimer Magritte with a Green Apple Mask

so, too, is the lone gunman a term of art for a cabal fiat executed by a host of winged monkeys many too familiar to us.