The Head Wounds Revisited

[Martin Hay]

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post70527

Martin,

the link above was my response to you in our ongoing discussion...

and there has been a good amount of discussion that followed... with a post of mine that discovered a few things I'd like you to comment on:

FBI says Kellerman takes 11 xrays with him...
Reed took at least 16 (8 of the arms/legs, 4 of the head, 4 of the body)
Reed says HE ran up and down to the 4th floor and that it took 25-30 minutes for 4 xrays...
All the xrays were said to be done by 8pm
Ebersole said HE ran the cassettes up
Reed says Ebersole did no such thing and the old man couldn't have made it up and down once in the time he was running back and forth
Ebersole says the SS TOLD THEM TO TAKE ANOTHER SET OF XRAYS - which he says they did
Reed says the SS never made a request related to the taking of xrays....
Finck tells us that there was no use of a saw... while Reed sees Humes cut the forehead.

Once again... seems to me as Reed/Custer are doing one set of xrays, Ebersole is doing another???

Then the question about the photos and Robinson's comments about where he sat in the morgue and what he saw...

Can you help reconcile what he says with the supposed images from Bethesda...
Eaglesham offers the following yet does not take into account Robinson's statement... or the statement that so many in attendance were to JFK's right..http://www.manuscriptservice.com/AutopsyRoom/

Your POV would be appreciated.


[ATTACH=CONFIG]4877[/ATTACH]

David,


Sorry, about not responding to you sooner. I've been too busy to spend much time on forums the last couple of days. Still am really so just time for a brief response.


With regard to the Reed/Ebersole disagreement, all that says to me is that there were two men who wanted to take all the credit for taking those historic X-rays. Human nature, I'm afraid. Nothing suspicious as far as I can see.


Question: how many people said they saw the head wound being enlarged/altered/manipulated/whatever BEFORE the first set of X-rays were taken? I don't know of any. Reading the eyewitness accounts, the chronology is clear. The first thing Humes and Boswell did was take X-rays of the skull. Then they reflected the scalp, sawed the skull, and removed the brain. So before any "alteration" occurred, they had documented the head wounds.


Reed did indeed see Humes sawing the skull and, as I pointed out before, Humes testified to doing so in order to remove the brain. Finck, by his own admission, was not even present when the head wound was opened up and the brain was removed so he had no personal knowledge of what actually happened and was obviously mistaken. That's all there is to that.


I'm finding your graphic confusing so can't offer much by way of meaningful comment.


I'll just note that, with at least (in most cases) 15 years between the autopsy and going on the record about what they saw, I'm not surprised at all that various witnesses gave conflicting accounts, were unsure or just plain wrong about certain details. I just think it's a shame that people don't take this into consideration when they're constructing their theories and try to take every word each witness offered as completely factual. Such an approach is doomed to fail as anyone who has given any thought to the frailty of human memory will understand.