20-06-2013, 03:59 PM
This really is an informative clip.
The FBI animation showing that the aircraft continued ascending over several thousand feet, after the explosion (in order to account the radar track of the missile) truly is Mickey Mouse stuff. Laughable, were it not so sad.
Stalcup says that a missile with a proximity fuse exploded close to the aircraft and brought it down that way - rather than penetrated it, and that the FBI focused on "pitting" that would arise from direct missile impact. If true, it's a very cunning diversionary tactic of the FBI that allows them to say they studied, in great detail, the theory of a missile impact, but there was no evidence for it. There wouldn't be if your eyes were closed to it.
The FBI also say there were no witnesses who saw a missile strike, yet many have come forward (and had at the time, as I remember this as events unfolded - but none were allowed to testify). So Kalstrom has to denigrate witnesses as being unreliable - yet it is standard procedure to use witness testimony in both civil and criminal trials.
Kalstrom also keeps pulling out the emotion card in support of his increasingly untenable conclusions.
The FBI animation showing that the aircraft continued ascending over several thousand feet, after the explosion (in order to account the radar track of the missile) truly is Mickey Mouse stuff. Laughable, were it not so sad.
Stalcup says that a missile with a proximity fuse exploded close to the aircraft and brought it down that way - rather than penetrated it, and that the FBI focused on "pitting" that would arise from direct missile impact. If true, it's a very cunning diversionary tactic of the FBI that allows them to say they studied, in great detail, the theory of a missile impact, but there was no evidence for it. There wouldn't be if your eyes were closed to it.
The FBI also say there were no witnesses who saw a missile strike, yet many have come forward (and had at the time, as I remember this as events unfolded - but none were allowed to testify). So Kalstrom has to denigrate witnesses as being unreliable - yet it is standard procedure to use witness testimony in both civil and criminal trials.
Kalstrom also keeps pulling out the emotion card in support of his increasingly untenable conclusions.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14