20-06-2013, 10:13 PM
In 2003 I explained Mantik's visits to the Archives measuring optical density and finding a fraudulent "patch" on the lateral, and a false "6.5 mm artifact" on the AP to our radiologist who was quite receptive. You know, bones, density--that being kind of what they do.
As well, I found Mantik in Murder in Dealey Plaza and in the following excerpt from his Thomas review to be very good:
More to the point, when I performed my own reconstruction, using a real skull X-ray (the only such attempt ever made, to my knowledge, under fluoroscopic guidance), the Harper fragment ended up mostly in the occipital area (see my Figure 5 here).
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4890[/ATTACH]
And of course, there was no brain in the stainless container, yet it weighed 1500 grams (over average) while such witnesses as Paul O'Connor would beg to differ.
Albert Rossi, you have a zip file of questions there to unpack.
I think Jackie went after a tortilla on the trunk and Clint Hill grabbed her (hand)
Gee, the Harper fragment wound up in a counterintuitive place
(as though the president and evidence were broken into a thousand pieces and scattered to the wind)
As for witnesses--we might keep in mind Warren Reynolds, Domingo Benevidez, Antonio Veciana who got a V-8 face palm
Anomalies abound; ten million words were bound but not indexed, cherry-picked to support the a priori plausible denial
Stringer in Holmes could not be more clear
Not my work, not the medium
Add Custer who cited for Gunn a missing T-3/4
Those inconvenient fragments would not see the light of day
As well, I found Mantik in Murder in Dealey Plaza and in the following excerpt from his Thomas review to be very good:
More to the point, when I performed my own reconstruction, using a real skull X-ray (the only such attempt ever made, to my knowledge, under fluoroscopic guidance), the Harper fragment ended up mostly in the occipital area (see my Figure 5 here).
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4890[/ATTACH]
And of course, there was no brain in the stainless container, yet it weighed 1500 grams (over average) while such witnesses as Paul O'Connor would beg to differ.
Albert Rossi, you have a zip file of questions there to unpack.
I think Jackie went after a tortilla on the trunk and Clint Hill grabbed her (hand)
Gee, the Harper fragment wound up in a counterintuitive place
(as though the president and evidence were broken into a thousand pieces and scattered to the wind)
As for witnesses--we might keep in mind Warren Reynolds, Domingo Benevidez, Antonio Veciana who got a V-8 face palm
Anomalies abound; ten million words were bound but not indexed, cherry-picked to support the a priori plausible denial
Stringer in Holmes could not be more clear
Not my work, not the medium
Add Custer who cited for Gunn a missing T-3/4
Those inconvenient fragments would not see the light of day