21-06-2013, 12:14 AM
Phil
tar zxfv skull.fragments.tgz
Leaving out the bone fragments (the triangular fragment and two smaller ones, for which we have only x-rays) reportedly found in the car (testimony of SS Agents Hill, Behn, Kellerman and Kinney) and brought into morgue later in the autopsy, since their provenance is contested, that leaves us:
Rearward:
1. Fragment on trunk picked up by Jackie
2. Fragment in follow-up SS car (1-2 in)
3. Brehm fragment to left/rear of position at Z313
Forward:
4. Harper Fragment
5. Burris Fragment
I leave aside the spatter of blood and brain matter, and just focus on fragments.
If there was only a wound to the occiput (which accounts for 1 and 2, though maybe not 3), my question was simply, how did 4/5 get where they were reported to be? Are we to discount these forward positions as hearsay? If not, how did it happen? That's all I was really asking.
tar zxfv skull.fragments.tgz
Leaving out the bone fragments (the triangular fragment and two smaller ones, for which we have only x-rays) reportedly found in the car (testimony of SS Agents Hill, Behn, Kellerman and Kinney) and brought into morgue later in the autopsy, since their provenance is contested, that leaves us:
Rearward:
1. Fragment on trunk picked up by Jackie
2. Fragment in follow-up SS car (1-2 in)
3. Brehm fragment to left/rear of position at Z313
Forward:
4. Harper Fragment
5. Burris Fragment
I leave aside the spatter of blood and brain matter, and just focus on fragments.
If there was only a wound to the occiput (which accounts for 1 and 2, though maybe not 3), my question was simply, how did 4/5 get where they were reported to be? Are we to discount these forward positions as hearsay? If not, how did it happen? That's all I was really asking.