21-06-2013, 12:56 AM
Albert Rossi Wrote:Phil
tar zxfv skull.fragments.tgz
Leaving out the bone fragments (the triangular fragment and two smaller ones, for which we have only x-rays) reportedly found in the car (testimony of SS Agents Hill, Behn, Kellerman and Kinney) and brought into morgue later in the autopsy, since their provenance is contested, that leaves us:
Rearward:
1. Fragment on trunk picked up by Jackie
2. Fragment in follow-up SS car (1-2 in)
3. Brehm fragment to left/rear of position at Z313
Forward:
4. Harper Fragment
5. Burris Fragment
I leave aside the spatter of blood and brain matter, and just focus on fragments.
If there was only a wound to the occiput (which accounts for 1 and 2, though maybe not 3), my question was simply, how did 4/5 get where they were reported to be? Are we to discount these forward positions as hearsay? If not, how did it happen? That's all I was really asking.
Albert... someone put them there. At least the Harper Fragment.
Regarding the Harper Fragment - this once again - is the FBI's version of the shots that hit within the limo...
There have been references to a shooter "BEHIND ZAPRUDER" and nehind the Newmans - iow, behind the pergola... Yet, if the Dallas people are even CLOSE to accurate, the Harper fragment was not something that came from JFK. It is simply too large to represent what could have flown off the skull - in any direction.
I submit the Harper fragment disappeared because it could never be biologically matched to JFK... and was only placed there to reinforce the shot from behind blowing the entire top of his head off....
Gruesome yet what about this case isn't?
DJ
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4891[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter