21-06-2013, 08:32 AM
Given: That the fragment was found the day AFTER;
Given: That in the analysis by Dr. David Mantik, MD, PhD, (as well as Harper et al) that the fragment is occipital;
(Vince Parietal to the contrary notwithstanding)
Given: That the location of discovery is consistent with Oswald Depository 6 SE;
Given: That the fragment was lost by the FBI;
Therefore: The fragment is occipital indicating a non-Oswald solution, hence was first planted, then destroyed.
Given: That in the analysis by Dr. David Mantik, MD, PhD, (as well as Harper et al) that the fragment is occipital;
(Vince Parietal to the contrary notwithstanding)
Given: That the location of discovery is consistent with Oswald Depository 6 SE;
Given: That the fragment was lost by the FBI;
Therefore: The fragment is occipital indicating a non-Oswald solution, hence was first planted, then destroyed.