The Head Wounds Revisited

[Gordon Gray]

David, is the (one way or another) phonied Harper fragment your own theory, or have others written about this as well?

===========
I was going to edit the previous post, but something went wrong with the database.

So I'll just add a tag line. If the plotters or their abetters took the Harper fragment from the seat of the limo or from the trunk or the follow-up SS car or wherever, and planted it further down the street in order to make it look like it was blown forward, then those particular individuals weren't very sophisticated, since the bone is most probably occipital (almost everyone who has examined it or the photo of it, with the exception of the FPP, says so), and it just does not make sense that bone from the back of the head would end up way down the street.

I have not read anywhere about the notion the Harper fragment was planted - it did just come to me as I thought about what you had posted and the reality that IF the wound was actually a 2-3" hole, there is no place from which the Harper fragment could come...

Regarding the delivery of fragments from Dallas to Bethesda that night... I'd need to do more research... but my gut tells me these are the fragments created when Humes et al break up JFK's head...

I know Gordon/Martin claim there was no time for that... I say that after the metal casket was rec'd... and Reed/Custer were asked to leave, we have 15-25 minutes when Humes, Boswell & Ebersole are in the morgue with the president's body... alone.

It is not possible to claim he arrived at 7pm on Humes' table given the contradictory evidence... or the reality of Sibert/O'Neill/Greer meeting Kellerman at the morgue entrance WITH the bronze casketed ambulance after 7pm... and the FBI CYA'ing about seeing JFK removed from this coffin and staying with the body. Admitting that the body was in the morgue at least an hour before it was "officially" and then making the argument that nothing nefarious happens to his head to change the wounds is imo very naive.

Ebersole was a radiation treatment specialist...not an xray tech... Asst Chief of Radiology I believe. His HSCA testimony reveals his desire to give himself more importance than was real... He fails to even mention Custer and Reed... btw - the portable xray machine was not necessary unless there was a problem with moving JFK to the xray room at Bethesda prior to 8pm... which of course there was... He was not yet supposed to be in the morgue when the xrays were being taken by Reed....

I think it very possible that in the 15-25 minutes prior to the SS/FBI casket charade... Humes and created the skull wounds and fragments... Ebersole's HSCA Med Panel testimony is an amazing example of "Specter-izing" the medical evidence.... The one thing that Ebersole would not let go of - even in his dishonesty - was that ALL THE SETS of xrays were done prior to the first incisions and no xrays were taken after the Y incision... The three xrays of the chest that supposedly show no internal organs also do not have JFK's medical record metal plate on them.... (you know like 0185 and 0187 both nor having their numbers on the film... but trust us, they were the original copies...

Back to Harper to conclude... I've seen images on the massive number of people on that grassy area.... kids, curious adults, etc... and this piece is found 4+ hours later. The fact that it is now gone from existence should tell you all you need to know. Like the Brain... this fragment was a prop - NOT from JFK or from the shooting... Even as we discuss a 2nd shot to the head from the rear, there was simply not enough skull missing (and they can't claim that bone exited thru and without the scalp) to account for these fragments....

One of the lowly techs testified that they took a hammer to JFK's head... the brain inside was said to be MUSH... no sections were taken... blah blah blah....

" I say that after the metal casket was rec'd... and Reed/Custer were asked to leave, we have 15-25 minutes when Humes, Boswell & Ebersole are in the morgue with the president's body... alone." But were they alone. Reed says there were photographers and lab technicians present when they carried in the shipping casket and placed the body on the table. The 15 minutes would have been the time to take initial photos of the body prior to opening it up. X Rays would have damaged their film. Also when Reed and Custer return, afterward he reports seeing no work having been done to the body."[size=12]They weren't opening anything up. There
was no saws or anything at that time that I was
aware of - anything that was going on medically at
the time" [/SIZE]
Had they reflected the scalp and enlarged the head wound he would have noticed that when he took XRays of the head wouldn't he. Or is he lying about that? If you are going to cite Reed as a source for your theory, you should explain why you discount some parts of his testimony and accept other parts.