23-06-2013, 02:35 AM
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Malcolm Perry was clear regarding the throat wound. What part of "preserved inviolate" fits the six-centimeter gash with ragged edges.
Dr. McClelland:
In his Warren Commission testimony, Dr. McClelland described his observations in detail:"As I took the position at the head of the table...to help out with the tracheotomy, I was in such a position that I could very closely examine the head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull had been extremely blasted. It had been shattered, apparently, by the force of the shot so that the parietal bone protruded up through the scalp and seemed to be fractured almost along its right posterior half, as well as some of the occipital bone being fractured almost along its lateral half, and this sprung open the bones that I mentioned in such a way that you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out. There was a large amount of bleeding which was occurring mainly from the large venous channels in the skull which had been blasted open" (6WCH 33).
Dr. Clark:
Dr. Kemp Clark, the then 38-year-old Chairman of Neurosurgery, stated in a typed report of November 22 that "[t]here was a large wound in the right occipitoparietal region...(and) [t]here was considerable loss of scalp and bone tissue. Both cerebral and cerebellar tissue were extruding from the wound" (CE 392:17WCH 3). Additionally, a handwritten report filed that same afternoon stated, "[t]here was a large wound beginning in the right occiput extending into the parietal region...(and) [m]uch of the posterior skull appeared gone at brief examination..." (CE392:17WCH 10). At a 1:30 p.m. press conference on that day, he told reporters that "[t]he head wound could have been either an exit wound from the neck or it could have been a tangential wound, as it was simply a large, gaping loss of tissue" (1327-C 5). During his Warren Commission testimony four months later, he added that he "...examined the wound in the back of the President's head. This was a large, gaping wound in the right posterior part, with cerebral and cerebellar tissue being damaged and exposed" (6WCH 20). In a series of interviews with researcher David Naro in January of 1994, Dr. Clark reaffirmed his original statements on several occasions and thus backed up the account of Dr. McClelland. "[T]he lower right occipital region of the occipital region was blown out and I saw cerebellum," he said. Furthermore, he added, "[i]n my opinion the wound was an exit wound" (Naro).
http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.bac...lland.html
No such large, gaping wound in the right posterior part, etc., presents in the report of Humes, the x-rays, the photographs and the lies of Blakey.
These men are capable of the most extraordinary lies.
Ebersole who claimed credit for the x-rays (falsely) may have a very different credit due.
He was in position to add the light blasting at the "patch" on the lateral and the 6.5 mm artifact on the AP.
His phone interview by Dr. David Mantik proceeded amiably enough until the latter asked Ebersole about this artifact--then Ebersole terminated the call and made no further reply to Dr. Mantik, ever.
Regarding the brain, Paul O'Connor said there was none or very little; that his job was to reflect the scalp, saw the skull, remove the brain--none of which were necessary.
And a weight of 1500 grams for the contents of an empty stainless container indicates yet one more lie.
X-ray transport halted for entry of official party--major distortion of the space-time continuum: another lie.
Robert Groden has eighty-one witnesses to this large occipitoparietal wound. There was brain flying everywhere. The odd skull fragment, too.
Yet the harpsichord and viola and the powdered wigs provide background for the photos of the back of the head.
Behold, a miracle.
Or, in the alternative, another lie.
For which Stringer had no explanation and Pitzer paid a very high price.
Humes remained shameless.
Some lied out of fear; some lied out of schedenfreude.
Humes to Gunn, "I certainly hope you figure this out."
Regarding the last line:
Humes to Gunn, "I certainly hope you figure this out."
Yes, that's what he said. . and now let me remind everyone what he told me, in November 1966, in a call for which there is a crystal clear tape:
"Lots of luck, is all I can tell you. It will take you the rest of your life." (from memory, but unforgettable).
And it has!
DSL
6/22/13; 6:40 PM PDT
Los Angeles, California