24-06-2013, 12:56 PM
Gordon Gray Wrote:Why would it have been necessary to conceal the fact that there were multiple shooters? As long as Oswald was shown to be one of them and he was connected to Castro, wouldn't it have been supposed that the others were too? This would seem to me only to increase the suspicion of a team of Castro agents being responsible. The LN scenario wasn't the initial aim of the plan, the false flag Castro operation was.
You have a moving target unfolding in many layers as it progressed. The shooters could have been brought in under many scenarios including one team thinking it was yet another test, or perhaps a shoot and miss operation in order to accuse Castro. The conspirators had already gone through the Cuban invasion dilemma with the Missile Crisis so there could have been yet another layer of plotters who designed the target as VietNam all along. This could have had a random organic evolution as those who took charge after the assassination decided what to do. However the alteration of the NSAM 273 document could have indicated intent prior to the shooting. Hence the move towards Lone Nut after the deed had been done. The Lone Nut scenario keeps the communists in play but only through the filter of a communist-leaning traitor. Any direct ties to communist influence would be used to convince the investigators they had an obligation to ignore any incriminating evidence other than that of the official story. If you back-build this scenario it becomes possible imposters were used in Mexico in order to disavow communist involvement if necessary. A very complex plot.
Don't forget there was some brain matter to the forward in the limousine.