26-06-2013, 12:02 AM
Thanks Phil.
That's what I mean. See, IMO, any author should be able to defend their work, thesis by thesis. Especially in the wake of the ARRB releases.
So therefore, I was open to any question, of any type, concerning my book. And I still am open to any questions.
I mean, I thought that this idea was rather elementary. Its one reason that people join forums.
If you cannot ask questions without being worried that someone will complain, I mean, what is the point? Or if you cannot criticize a book without someone calling you a Nazi and comparing you to Torquemada and book burning, I mean, give me a break.
And like I said, I like Hank. I think he is a good guy. And I like a lot of his work. But if you cannot question anything about an author's work, then count me out.
That's what I mean. See, IMO, any author should be able to defend their work, thesis by thesis. Especially in the wake of the ARRB releases.
So therefore, I was open to any question, of any type, concerning my book. And I still am open to any questions.
I mean, I thought that this idea was rather elementary. Its one reason that people join forums.
If you cannot ask questions without being worried that someone will complain, I mean, what is the point? Or if you cannot criticize a book without someone calling you a Nazi and comparing you to Torquemada and book burning, I mean, give me a break.
And like I said, I like Hank. I think he is a good guy. And I like a lot of his work. But if you cannot question anything about an author's work, then count me out.