26-06-2013, 12:38 AM
Albert Rossi Wrote:David, that's a provocative superposition. I wonder, though, why the edge of what would be the contour of the occipital in the traditional interpretation of the X-ray cuts through the hair/neck on the photo.
Here is a pre-mortem lateral of JFK (from Fetzer, ed., Assassination Science, p. 159), presented as part of Mantik's original study of optical density. The contours look very similar to the autopsy X-ray.
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/att...1372201568
Sorry for the rotten reproduction ... my scanner is crappy.
No problem and thanks for the reply...
I think you may be taking the composite too literally. I simplywanted to show that it MAY be possible that the "lateral" xray was not all that "lateral"...
If you can place the xray in it's proper orientation to the TOP graphic I posted, the lateral view, please do so.
I can't seem to make that "cut-thru" work from any angle...
Based on Mantik, couldn't this be a copy of an original with that portion of the xray simply removed...
What would be causing that "cut-thru" in either orientation?
I did this gif a while back just to see if they indeed matched.... they obviously do... yet where are the facial bones in the older xray... the jaw?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4907[/ATTACH]
Here is a quick overlay I just did... Is the orientation correct? How come we do not see the rest of the facial bones?
Thanks
DJ
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4908[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter