The Splintering Frame

[David Guyatt]

At the great risk of appearing to have completely gone off the rails to some, here is what I now think to be a distinct possibility:

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky touched something mysterious in her life. Everything about the woman is an endless mystery. I'm not at all sure what she touched can be known, or even if it is important now that it is known. What is important is that she touched an opening in the consciousness of man. And, if mankind was/is ever to awaken to what she discovered, life on earth would be completely different for us all.

The Gatekeepers (think of the "Sponsors" as Charles defines them) are aware of Blavatsky and this opening. Hitler and the group around him very much believed in the reality of what Blavatsky touched. The financial group that sponsored Hitler knew of all this and have a tremendous interest in keeping all of it esoteric, silly, marginalized to the public at large. Why? Because it would be the end of their power in the world. They exist in the current psychological paradigm. When that paradigm is changed (when it splinters, explodes, begins to unravel), they lose everything.

It's important the story (frame) is believed. That the "reality" of it is a certainty and unquestioned. If the human mind was ever to have an awakening to truth, the game is over. A shift in consciousness will take place, and all of this changes.

It's not a matter of "doing" anything. Marching on Washington. Voting. Doing "good" deeds. Or even knowing. All of it is inside the boundaries of the frame.

What is important is the awakening of mind to the totality of being instead of living in the small, fragmentary corner of self, filled with endless strife and conflict. What we are inwardly manifest into relationship and into the world. It is important to the Gatekeepers/Sponsors to keep the division, the confusion alive. Without it, they no longer exist.

The last century, I think, was a lot richer than we realize. A great deal was going on beneath the surface in a struggle to bring light into the world. It is my feeling that the assassination of President Kennedy served many purposes for these Gatekeepers/Sponsors. Perhaps the primary one being to further the confusion and push consciousness back into a controlled parameter. I feel it is a distinct possibility that President Kennedy was chosen for his role before he even entered office.

There is more than than this this-ness. The total being of man is now a possibility. It doesn't have to be like this. The responsibility for awakening does not lie outside the boundary of the frame. The responsibility for the awakening does not happen at a different time. It is all here and now in each of us.

When the total is seen, without reference, what happens to the frame, to being? That question, I now feel, leads to the opening that could change everything.

Charles, David, Tracy and Phil, thank you for contributing value to this thread.

The leading question is, of course, will (or even can) the awakening of mind happen on a Collective scale? It can and does happen on a personal level, but that doesn't exactly translate to the bigger picture.

Another question might be asked, namely: should the awakening of mind happen on a Collective scale? I have my doubts that it should or even can. There is a lock of blindness involved.

The fact seems to be that the great universal truth / universal secret can be spoken quite openly and all but those ready to see it and hear it, simply walk on by, impervious to what they have missed. After all, the great secret was always carved into the lintel over the door of the Greek mystery schools, for all to see, and I don't imagine one in a thousand entered students took the slightest bit of notice of it. Later in their development they will have understood it, assuming they stayed the course that is.

My take is that Blavatsky certainly wasn't the first, or the last, to touch the pulse of consciousness. Speaking personally, and no disrespect is intended when I say this, but I have found her school/system (call it what you will) to be muddled and lacking in clarity. But that's just me, of course. We each are different and as such require different triggers to open the doors. Whatever works, works so to speak.