Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency and GM Evica's writings

[Marcus Hanson]

1)I know ,from reading other threads here , that you profile new members.
Had I wanted to hide my identity , I would have registered under another name.

The deception would have had a short shelf life: Your embrace of the LN lie would have seeped out of you like pus from an infected wound.

You imply - nay , you STATE - that I am "cognitively impaired".

Not true. I left open the possibilities that you do not enjoy reasonable access to the legitimate evidence in the JFK case and/or that you are complicit in the crime.

I am now prepared to stipulate that, to the best of my ability to judge, you do indeed enjoy access to legitimate evidence in the JFK case.

[/COLOR]You state : "The Lone Nut lie will not be debated or otherwise entertained on Deep Politics Forum".

That is hardly consistent with the "free speech" clause in the Rules of Engagement , is it ?

It is damnably consistent with DPF's policy of not engaging proponents of the LN lie. Rather, our missions are to expose and ridicule them for what they are. Your LN position is not worthy of serious consideration. It is a long-exposed deception, and you will not be allowed to imply, let alone directly state, that it is anything but a lie.


There is no place for you here, Mr. Hanson. You have failed in your mission.

Go away, please.

What was it Henry Ford said ? Something about you can have any colour , as long as it's black ? Here , it's you can have any opinion - as long as you don't attack Oswald.

Sorry it took me so long to reply , but I see there's been some developments since then. How's all that petty political in-fighting going between you and certain other DPF-ers ?