Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Peter Lemkin]

I don't see the evidence of the inside job other that a conceptual framework connecting dots. My sense is that the attacks were expected, enocuraged and facilitated even... but the response was ready to roll out well in advance. Military has all sorts of plans on the shelf... then and now.

Why does this Forum tolerate this foolishness or knowing agency of disinformation? He was booted out of A&Efor911Truth, he has [to my knowledge] zero defenders/compatriots of his unzipping of the WTC theory, and he says about WTC7: "Building 7 in many ways is the key to understanding that 9/11 was not an inside job"! Sorry Jeff...you 'seem' like a 'nice' guy...but you are, in my book, on the side of the/our/my enemy who is attacking us daily. [i.e. dangerous if not exposed!]. After trying to engage you, I have for about a year ignored you...I can in good conscience no longer. I don't believe for a minute you are who you present yourself to be. Your zipper theory is not in compliance with the evidence nor with physics. Your claims that we mortals don't understand all you [alone, of all architects] learned and understand is nothing short of propaganda for the Enemy, IMO. If there were anything to your 'theory' or even to the general notion of fires bringing down the only three steel frame building ever to fail due to [supposed] fire, the entire building codes would have been revised - and they have not been. 9-11 was an inside job in which THREE towers were brought down with pre-planted nanothermite[ate]. All evidence if looked at honestly [except by Sunnsteinian agents] leads to that conclusion. Not even NIST [9-11 official version whores and ass-lickers] buys any of your 'theory' - you are a ''scientific' expert analysis' of ONE! [and IMO, one too many].

The three WTC towers did not 'unzip'; they were exploded [as all evidence shows], and fell at near free-fall speeds [no resistance] - additionally, the energy needed for what happened exceeds by a HUGE factor that in the building's potential energy. Give it up. Kindly find another place to ply your 9-11 snake oil...and DPF kindly look into this matter. Your sympathetic postings on other matters I find a clever ploy. I trust you not one jot for your word on 9-11 nor on any other matter. You have an agenda here, IMO, and I think it a dangerous one for the Forum to give 'voice' to, and for America [what's left of it]. This is my view alone - but I know it is shared here by others. I'll let them speak for themselves.