10-08-2013, 05:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2013, 02:23 PM by Stan Wilbourne.)
Hello Phil,
Does the thinker create thought? Or, does thought create the thinker? An old question, but if you carry it with you long enough, something begins to shift.
If the thinker is the creator, well enough. The world spins on in its "greased grooves." But. If thought is the creator (of the thinker) EVERYTHING flips. The field of being moves. The frame splits wide open, if there is a perception, if there is an awakening to this.
When the thinker creates thought - when the concept is unquestionably believed, consciousness can be controlled and shaped. Mined. Cultivated. Harvested. Used as a resource like any other thing on earth.
Thought is matter, right? Therefore a "thing." Material. It can be owned. Free thinking? I wonder if that is even possible.
When suffering takes place in human consciousness, it (consciousness) becomes much more malleable. When President Kennedy was assassinated, a deep wave of suffering took place inside the boundaries of human consciousness. This wave folds into the layers of being at great depth for generations, into the subconscious. And, the frame became a much more fertile field to be moved and shaped.
We take suffering for granted. It is never questioned. Does suffering have to be a way of life? Can it ever come to a complete stop? Not idealistically but in reality (the thinker IS suffering, right)? The way the current mind is framed, it cannot even conceive of the question. Which, I suggest, just maybe, was one of the intentions of the Kennedy assassination: to the keep the frame in place and from questioning itself, and to perhaps harvest some energy derived from human suffering.
Does the thinker create thought? Or, does thought create the thinker? Is there a non-reality to self? If so, our entire culture, our entire being is based on a false premise. The frame.
It is my feeling (?) the infinite is calling mankind, at this crucial juncture in the history of the world. That calling comes at a huge price: the death of personal psychology. As we frightfully cling to the frame. Seeking a security that does not exist, traveling through time with our heads voluntarily bowed to the earth while the heavens are speaking in the language of silence we cannot acknowledge.
K/Blavatsky/Jung. That's a winner.
Does the thinker create thought? Or, does thought create the thinker? An old question, but if you carry it with you long enough, something begins to shift.
If the thinker is the creator, well enough. The world spins on in its "greased grooves." But. If thought is the creator (of the thinker) EVERYTHING flips. The field of being moves. The frame splits wide open, if there is a perception, if there is an awakening to this.
When the thinker creates thought - when the concept is unquestionably believed, consciousness can be controlled and shaped. Mined. Cultivated. Harvested. Used as a resource like any other thing on earth.
Thought is matter, right? Therefore a "thing." Material. It can be owned. Free thinking? I wonder if that is even possible.
When suffering takes place in human consciousness, it (consciousness) becomes much more malleable. When President Kennedy was assassinated, a deep wave of suffering took place inside the boundaries of human consciousness. This wave folds into the layers of being at great depth for generations, into the subconscious. And, the frame became a much more fertile field to be moved and shaped.
We take suffering for granted. It is never questioned. Does suffering have to be a way of life? Can it ever come to a complete stop? Not idealistically but in reality (the thinker IS suffering, right)? The way the current mind is framed, it cannot even conceive of the question. Which, I suggest, just maybe, was one of the intentions of the Kennedy assassination: to the keep the frame in place and from questioning itself, and to perhaps harvest some energy derived from human suffering.
Does the thinker create thought? Or, does thought create the thinker? Is there a non-reality to self? If so, our entire culture, our entire being is based on a false premise. The frame.
It is my feeling (?) the infinite is calling mankind, at this crucial juncture in the history of the world. That calling comes at a huge price: the death of personal psychology. As we frightfully cling to the frame. Seeking a security that does not exist, traveling through time with our heads voluntarily bowed to the earth while the heavens are speaking in the language of silence we cannot acknowledge.
K/Blavatsky/Jung. That's a winner.