Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Jan,
With all due respect... that comment is very dismissive. I am thinking and it is you that is not engaging in a dialog.

I have asked you to explain something... something that i can't comprehend by THINKING, reasoning and using the tools of logic I have... and your reply is

THINK

are you serious?

Jeffrey - I am dismissive of your comments because you post assertive deep political statements without undertaking any research or performing due diligence.

There are numerous threads about Gladio, and its successor operations, here. Indeed, I can confidently say that DPF is the internet forum which has the most material about, and analysis of, Gladio.

You appear to have read none of it.

Or if you have read some of it, you haven't understood it.

Exhibit #1:

Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Gladio was created after WWII as a check by the right on the leftists who were being supported by the USSR.

This is completely and utterly wrong. I have shown you why it is wrong. More than once. And then you drag Dawkins and biological determinism into it.....

DPF is not a deep political kindergarten.

Jan,
I signed up at DPF because Ed Jewit thought I could add something of use to the 911 discussions. That was no easy task consider the technical perspective I was trying to bring to the discussion. But there was some uninformed nonsense coming from Fetzer and Boldwyn with Lemkin parroting whatever he read and dropping it into the discussion along with insults.

I did not read the Gladio thread and have barely a cursory interest in Deep Politics, although I am interests in political analysis and not the rubbish in the MSM and what passes for politics in the USA.

I don't like to be sent off to do homework when a summary in a response should be enough to explain the (gladio) matter. If the summary book jacket interests me I will read the book.

Whatever Gladio IS or was... when it began and so forth, precipitating it down to:

it's a power and control extending power and control is hardly distinguishing Gladio from any other entrenched power structure is in constant self preservation mode and seeking to secure this... obviously through... you guessed it.. power and control.

So no 911 was not simply about knocking down a few buildings... it had a bigger purpose to whomever was behind it. That's pretty fundamental.


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 11-08-2013, 03:15 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,991 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,235 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 4,047 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,553 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,728 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,720 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 10,680 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 2,697 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 9,256 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 6,482 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)