11-08-2013, 05:12 PM
Albert Rossi Wrote:Hi all. Since I am relatively new here, I would like to ask a question. How do people feel about these acronyms that are used on other forums, such as jfkassassination.alt (which I had the misfortune of finding first back in 2010 when I had just become aware of all the internet activity on JFK): LNs, CTers, etc. If it were up to me, I would discourage their use here. The use of such labels does nothing but underwrite the status-quo framing, even if "appropriated" by the group they are meant to designate. My interest in crimes against democracy has nothing to do with belonging to a category, or a "team", like being a Democrat or Republican or rooting for the Yankees or the Red Sox. I find being called a "CTer" nearly as offensive as being called an "assassination buff" (what does such a person do, build model assassinations in the garage?).
I agree with every word.
These frames are usually created by the enemy.
A prime example is the ridiculous "Truther", which is a label deliberately created to discredit those who perform original research into 9/11.
As for "Conspiracy Theory", it's the grandaddy of psyops. See here.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war

