Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:
Tony Szamboti Wrote:Albert, there was a very detailed computer simulation of the impact done by the NIST. See NCSTAR 1-2. There were very few core columns damaged as the wings did not make it to the core. So by volume alone only a few core columns could be hit.

Your thinking regarding the structure below the 98th floor where initiation began is flawed. If that structure gave way first then the collapse would not have initiated at the 98th floor. I'll give you a reason the collapse started at the 98th floor. It was because it was the closest place to the impact where there was no damage and charges would not have been displaced. Even after the initiation the first floors to collapse where the 99th, 100th, and 101st floors. This is verifiable on video. Now why would four stories above the impact damage actually be the first to collapse?

NIST is fine when you agree with them and the devil when you don't. Shorter.. NIST did not produce reliable report, flubbed observations and came up with the wrong explanation for all the collapses but got some stuff right.

The mass of the plane... like 250,000 or whatever (look it up) and the fuel... did not disappear and it was moving at 450 knots. Do you know how much kinetic energy is the fuel alone has...not to mention the keel, the landing gear, the engine and so forth.

And the interior core damage is hard to determine has has not been documented by NIST... But one landing gear made it through the building and landed in a parking lot on Liberty Street...puny wheel.

We know the building showed movement before release... so it was coming apart up there and when enough of the frame was useless the whole top dropped and ROOSD began and no need to weaken the frame... and we know it survived the floor collapse anyway.

Face the truth... the whole truth and nothing but the truth...

There is no evidence for placed devices in the towers...

Everything NIST did was not incorrect and it is ignorant to assume that all parts of a large report are incorrect based on a finding that one area is. The wings could not have made it to the core in the North Tower as they were shredded by the exterior and the floors they hit edge on. Even if they were to take out everything in their path, by volume alone the remaining fuselage, landing gear, and engine parts could not have damaged many core columns.

When a fireman says he saw flashes going around the building like a belt and the building is coming down like there is no tomorrow, that isn't evidence of some form of devices in the building to you?


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Tony Szamboti - 11-08-2013, 07:55 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 4,794 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,096 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 3,691 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,188 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,617 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,569 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 9,868 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 2,578 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 8,510 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 6,360 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)